Cawley John H, Whitford Andrew B
Department of Policy Analysis and Management, Cornell University, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Apr;32(2):317-47. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2006-041.
In 2003, Congress passed the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act, which required that in 2006 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implement a system of competitive bids to set payments for the Medicare Advantage program. Managed care plans now bid for the right to enroll Medicare beneficiaries. Data from the first year of bidding suggest that imperfect competition is limiting the success of the bidding system. This article offers suggestions to improve this system based on findings from auction theory and previous government-run auctions. In particular, CMS can benefit by adjusting its system of competitive bids in four ways: credibly committing to regulations governing bidding; limiting the scope for collusion, entry deterrence, and predatory behavior among bidders; adjusting how benchmark reimbursement rates are set; and accounting for asymmetric information among bidders.
2003年,国会通过了《医疗保险处方药、改进与现代化法案》,该法案要求医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)在2006年实施竞争性投标系统,以确定医疗保险优势计划的支付标准。管理式医疗计划现在为争取招收医疗保险受益人的权利进行投标。第一年投标的数据表明,不完全竞争正在限制投标系统的成效。本文根据拍卖理论和以往政府主导拍卖的结果,提出改进该系统的建议。特别是,CMS可以通过以下四种方式调整其竞争性投标系统而受益:切实承诺遵守投标管理规定;限制投标人之间勾结、阻止进入和掠夺性行为的空间;调整基准报销率的设定方式;以及考虑投标人之间的信息不对称问题。