• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过竞争性投标支付医疗保险优势计划费用:存在多少竞争?

Paying Medicare Advantage plans by competitive bidding: how much competition is there?

作者信息

Biles Brian, Pozen Jonah, Guterman Stuart

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University.

出版信息

Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 Aug;65:1-12.

PMID:19685587
Abstract

Private health plans that enroll Medicare beneficiaries--known as Medicare Advantage (MA) plans--are being paid $11 billion more in 2009 than it would cost to cover these beneficiaries in regular fee-for-service Medicare. To generate Medicare savings for offsetting the costs of health reform, the Obama Administration has proposed eliminating these extra payments to private insurers and instituting a competitive bidding system that pays MA plans based on the bids they submit. This study examines the concentration of enrollment among MA plans and the degree to which firms offering MA plans actually face competition. The results show that in the large majority of U.S. counties, MA plan enrollment is highly concentrated in a small number of firms. Given the relative lack of competition in many markets as well as the potential impact on traditional Medicare, the authors call for careful consideration of a new system for setting MA plan payments.

摘要

吸纳医疗保险受益人的私人健康计划——即所谓的医疗保险优势(MA)计划——在2009年获得的支付比按照常规按服务收费的医疗保险模式覆盖这些受益人所需的成本多出110亿美元。为了节省医疗保险开支以抵消医疗改革的成本,奥巴马政府提议取消向私人保险公司的这些额外支付,并建立一个竞争性投标系统,根据MA计划提交的投标来支付费用。本研究考察了MA计划中的参保集中度,以及提供MA计划的公司实际面临竞争的程度。结果显示,在美国绝大多数县,MA计划的参保高度集中于少数几家公司。鉴于许多市场相对缺乏竞争以及对传统医疗保险的潜在影响,作者呼吁谨慎考虑一种设定MA计划支付的新系统。

相似文献

1
Paying Medicare Advantage plans by competitive bidding: how much competition is there?通过竞争性投标支付医疗保险优势计划费用:存在多少竞争?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 Aug;65:1-12.
2
The continuing cost of privatization: extra payments to Medicare Advantage plans jump to $11.4 billion in 2009.私有化的持续成本:2009年向医疗保险优势计划额外支付的费用跃升至114亿美元。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 May;51:1-18.
3
The cost of privatization: extra payments to Medicare Advantage plans.私有化的成本:向医疗保险优势计划额外支付的费用。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2004 May(750):1-12.
4
Medicare Advantage's private fee-for-service plans: paying for coordinated care without the coordination.医疗保险优势计划中的私人按服务收费计划:未实现协调却为协调护理付费。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2008 Oct;48:1-12.
5
Medicare beneficiary out-of-pocket costs: are Medicare Advantage Plans a better deal?医疗保险受益人的自付费用:医疗保险优势计划是否更划算?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2006 May;19:1-16.
6
Improving the design of competitive bidding in Medicare Advantage.改进医疗保险优势计划中的竞争性投标设计。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Apr;32(2):317-47. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2006-041.
7
The continuing cost of privatization: extra payments to Medicare Advantage plans in 2008.私有化的持续成本:2008年向医疗保险优势计划支付的额外费用。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2008 Sep;43:1-15.
8
The current state of affairs in managed care: lessons learned and the impact of Medicare advantage.管理式医疗的现状:经验教训及医疗保险优势计划的影响
Caring. 2008 Jan;27(1):6-7, 1.
9
Medicare Advantage reforms: comparing House and Senate bills.医疗保险优势改革:众议院和参议院法案对比
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 Dec;74:1-12.
10
Competitive bidding in Medicare Advantage: effect of benchmark changes on plan bids.医疗保险优势计划中的竞争性投标:基准变化对计划投标的影响。
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Early Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans on Health Expenditure.早期双重资格特殊需要计划对卫生支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2165-2184. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12778. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Health care choices and decisions in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大的医疗保健选择与决策。
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1803-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1566.