O'Kearney Richard
School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;41(3):199-212. doi: 10.1080/00048670601172707.
The aim of the present paper was to critically examine evidence about the benefits of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) from controlled and single group studies, including its benefits relative to medication are critically reviewed. Selected studies were categorized by study type and by risk of bias classification. Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g or Cohen d) and, where appropriate, weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated. All five comparison and 14 one-group studies showed a significant benefit for CBT within a wide range (ES = .78 to 4.38). Low risk of bias studies produced the lower adjusted effect sizes. The best available estimate of CBT efficacy relative to no treatment is about 1 standardized mean difference, equivalent to a treatment effect of 8 points on the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale. This represents a reduction in the risk of continuing to have OCD post-treatment of about 37% (95% CI 14% to 54%). Evidence from 3 studies indicates that the efficacy of CBT and medication do not differ significantly. CBT combined with medication is significantly more efficacious than non-active controls or medication alone but not relative to CBT alone. CBT should be regarded as a first line equivalent to anti-OCD medication with the potential to lead to better outcomes when combined with medication than medication alone can provide. Additional studies are needed to further clarify CBT's benefits and to investigate how it can be made more available as a treatment option for children and youth who suffer from OCD.
本文的目的是严格审查来自对照研究和单组研究的关于认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗儿童强迫症(OCD)益处的证据,包括其相对于药物治疗的益处也进行了严格审查。选定的研究按研究类型和偏倚风险分类进行归类。计算了标准化均数差(Hedges' g或Cohen d),并在适当情况下计算了加权均数差(WMD)。所有五项比较研究和14项单组研究均表明CBT在广泛范围内具有显著益处(效应量=0.78至4.38)。偏倚风险低的研究产生的调整后效应量较低。相对于未治疗,CBT疗效的最佳可用估计约为1个标准化均数差,相当于在儿童耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表上有8分的治疗效果。这意味着治疗后持续患有强迫症的风险降低了约37%(95%置信区间14%至54%)。三项研究的证据表明,CBT和药物治疗的疗效没有显著差异。CBT联合药物治疗比非活性对照或单独药物治疗显著更有效,但相对于单独CBT并无差异。CBT应被视为与抗强迫症药物等效的一线治疗方法,与药物联合使用时可能比单独使用药物产生更好的效果。需要进一步的研究来进一步阐明CBT的益处,并调查如何使其作为患有强迫症的儿童和青少年的治疗选择更易于获得。