Suppr超能文献

使用植入尺骨的种植体增加上颌后部萎缩无牙区骨量:一项前瞻性单盲对照临床试验。

Augmentation of the posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla with implants placed in the ulna: a prospective single-blind controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Cannizzaro Gioacchino, Leone Michele, Consolo Ugo, Ferri Vittorio, Licitra Giogio, Worthington Helen, Esposito Marco

机构信息

Department of Dentistry and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Private Practice, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(2):280-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new method to treat the posterior atrophic edentulous maxilla: dental implants placed in the ulna and transplanted with their surrounding bone blocks as inlays into the sinus. Conventional sinus augmentation with particulated autogenous bone grafts served as a control procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two implants were placed in the ulnas of 20 patients. After 6 weeks, bone blocks containing 1 to 3 implants were harvested and transplanted into the sinuses protruding 3 to 4 mm. Implants were left to heal for 6 weeks. Twenty patients with similar treatment indications treated with particulated bone grafts from the mental symphysis, tibia, or iliac crest acted as controls. Grafts were allowed to heal for 6 months in the control group. Fifty-two control-group implants were allowed to heal for 4 months. The main outcome measures were prosthetic and implant success. Stability of individual implants was assessed with Osstell and Periotest at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of loading. Independent sample chi-square tests, t tests, and paired t tests were used with a significance level of .05.

RESULTS

No patient dropped out or withdrew; no prosthesis or implant failed. No major surgical complications were occurred. There were no differences between the 2 groups at any time point in implant stability. Both modalities resulted in a significant increase of implant stability at 6 and 12 months. The mean change (SD) from baseline to 1 year in Periotest measurements was 1.44 (0.48) in the test and 1.29 (0.58) in the control (paired t tests; P < .001). For the Osstell, these values were -5.88 (4.18) and -5.48 (3.93) for the test and control groups, respectively (paired t tests: P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ulna implant block grafting represents an alternative to conventional sinus augmentation, particularly when vertical augmentation is desirable or large iliac crest grafts are needed.

摘要

目的

评估一种治疗上颌后牙区萎缩性无牙颌的新方法:将牙种植体植入尺骨,并将其周围的骨块作为嵌体移植到上颌窦。采用传统的自体颗粒骨移植进行上颌窦提升作为对照。

材料与方法

在20例患者的尺骨中植入52枚种植体。6周后,获取包含1至3枚种植体的骨块,并将其移植到上颌窦,使其突出3至4毫米。种植体愈合6周。20例具有相似治疗指征的患者采用来自颏部、胫骨或髂嵴的颗粒骨移植作为对照。对照组的移植骨愈合6个月。52枚对照组种植体愈合4个月。主要观察指标为修复体和种植体的成功率。在基线以及加载6个月和12个月后,使用Osstell和Periotest评估单个种植体的稳定性。采用独立样本卡方检验、t检验和配对t检验,显著性水平为0.05。

结果

无患者退出或失访;无修复体或种植体失败。未发生重大手术并发症。两组在任何时间点的种植体稳定性均无差异。两种方法均使种植体在6个月和12个月时的稳定性显著增加。从基线到1年,试验组Periotest测量值的平均变化(标准差)为1.44(0.48),对照组为1.29(0.58)(配对t检验;P < 0.001)。对于Osstell,试验组和对照组的这些值分别为-5.88(4.18)和-5.48(3.93)(配对t检验:P < 0.001)。

结论

尺骨种植体块状移植是传统上颌窦提升的一种替代方法,特别是在上颌窦需要垂直提升或需要大量髂骨移植时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验