Suppr超能文献

部分牙列缺损患者中,无瓣手术植入种植体与传统种植体的即刻功能负载:一项3年随机对照临床试验

Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Cannizzaro Gioacchino, Leone Michele, Consolo Ugo, Ferri Vittorio, Esposito Marco

机构信息

Department of Dentistry and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Sep-Oct;23(5):867-75.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of immediate functionally loaded implants placed with a flapless procedure (test group) versus implants placed after flap elevation and conventional load-free healing (control group) in partially edentulous patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients were randomized: 20 to the flapless immediately loaded group and 20 to the conventional group. To be immediately loaded, implants had to be inserted with a minimum torque > 45 Ncm. Implants in the immediately loaded group were provided with full acrylic resin temporary restorations the same day. Implants in the conventional group were submerged (anterior region) or left unsubmerged (posterior region) and were left load-free for 3 months (mandibles) or 4 months (maxillae). Provisional restorations were replaced with definitive single metal-ceramic crowns 1 month postloading. Outcome measures were prosthesis and implant failures, biological and prosthetic complications, postoperative edema, pain, and use of analgesics. Independent sample chi2 tests, Mann-Whitney tests, t tests, and paired t tests were used with a significance level of .05.

RESULTS

Fifty-two implants were placed in the flapless group and 56 in the conventionally loaded group. In the flapless group, 1 flap had to be raised to control the direction of the bur and 1 implant did not reach the planned primary stability and was treated as belonging to the conventional group. After 3 years no dropouts or failures occurred. There was no statistically significant difference for complications; however, patients in the conventional group had significantly more postoperative edema and pain and consumed more analgesics than those in the flapless group. Osstell values were significantly higher at baseline in the flapless group (P = .033). When comparing baseline data with years 1, 2, and 3 within each group, mean Osstell values of the flapless group did not increase, whereas there were statistically significant increases in the Periotest values.

CONCLUSIONS

Implants can be successfully placed flapless and loaded immediately without compromising success rates; the procedure decreases treatment time and patient discomfort.

摘要

目的

比较在部分牙列缺损患者中,采用不翻瓣手术即刻功能负载种植体(试验组)与翻瓣术后常规无负载愈合种植体(对照组)的疗效。

材料与方法

40例患者被随机分组:20例进入不翻瓣即刻负载组,20例进入常规组。要实现即刻负载,种植体植入时的最小扭矩须>45 Ncm。即刻负载组的种植体在同一天安装全丙烯酸树脂临时修复体。常规组的种植体在颌骨前部区域进行埋植(下颌骨)或不埋植(上颌骨),并在3个月(下颌骨)或4个月(上颌骨)内无负载。加载后1个月,临时修复体更换为最终的单金属烤瓷冠。观察指标包括修复体和种植体失败情况、生物学和修复并发症、术后水肿、疼痛以及镇痛药的使用情况。采用独立样本卡方检验、曼-惠特尼检验、t检验和配对t检验,显著性水平为0.05。

结果

不翻瓣组植入52枚种植体,常规负载组植入56枚种植体。在不翻瓣组中,有1例需翻瓣以控制车针方向,1枚种植体未达到计划的初期稳定性,被视为常规组病例。3年后无失访或失败病例。并发症方面无统计学显著差异;然而,常规组患者术后水肿和疼痛更明显,服用的镇痛药也比不翻瓣组更多。不翻瓣组基线时的Osstell值显著更高(P = 0.033)。在比较每组内基线数据与第1、2和3年的数据时,不翻瓣组的平均Osstell值未增加,而Periotest值有统计学显著增加。

结论

种植体可不翻瓣成功植入并即刻负载,且不影响成功率;该方法可缩短治疗时间并减轻患者不适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验