Clinical Service Unit Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
CJEM. 2003 Sep;5(5):331-5.
Reviews of the medical literature have always been an important resource for physicians. Increasingly, qualitative and quantitative "systematic reviews" have replaced the traditional "narrative review" as a means of capturing and summarizing current evidence on a topic or, when possible, answering a specific clinical question. This paper is part one of a two-part series designed to provide emergency physicians with the background necessary to locate, critically evaluate and interpret systematic reviews. The paper provides a brief background on systematic reviews and general principles on locating and critically appraising them. To facilitate readability, examples from the emergency medicine literature have been included for illustrative purposes and technical details have been kept to a minimum. The references, however, are comprehensive and provide a resource for readers seeking further information.
医学文献综述一直是医生的重要资源。越来越多的定性和定量“系统评价”已经取代了传统的“叙述性综述”,成为一种捕捉和总结某一主题当前证据的手段,或者在可能的情况下,回答特定的临床问题。本文是两部分系列的第一部分,旨在为急诊医师提供必要的背景知识,以便定位、批判性评估和解释系统评价。本文简要介绍了系统评价的背景,以及定位和批判性评估系统评价的一般原则。为了便于阅读,文中包含了来自急诊医学文献的示例,仅作说明之用,技术细节尽量简化。然而,参考文献是全面的,可以为寻求进一步信息的读者提供资源。