Suppr超能文献

使用D-STAT干绷带控制血管穿刺部位出血:376例患者的多中心经验。

The use of the D-STAT dry bandage for the control of vascular access site bleeding: a multicenter experience in 376 patients.

作者信息

Hallak Omar K, Cubeddu Roberto J, Griffith Rose A, Reyes Bernardo J

机构信息

Charleston Cardiovascular Consultants, Charleston Area Medical Center, 3211 MacCorkle Avenue SE, Charleston, WV 25304, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;30(4):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9019-4.

Abstract

Multiple topical hemostats have been approved for control of surface bleeding from vascular access sites. The majority of these devices, however, have few clinical data supporting their use. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the new commercially available D-Stat Dry hemostatic bandage compared to standard care manual compression. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial was conducted in patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization or peripheral angiography utilizing femoral artery access. Subjects were randomized to either the D-Stat Dry bandage as an adjunct to manual compression or manual compression alone. Primary end points were time-to-hemostasis (TTH) and major complications. Secondary end points included minor complications, patient satisfaction, time-to-ambulation (TTA), and time-to-discharge (TTD). Three hundred seventy-six subjects (189 control, 187 investigational) with similar baseline characteristics participated in the study. The mean age was 61.5 years, with a male predominance of 58%. TTH was significantly lower in the investigational group (7.8 vs. 13.0 min; p = 0.001). No difference in major complication rates was observed between the groups. The mean TTA (investigational, 392 min, vs. control, 415 min; p = 0.023) and patient satisfaction significantly favored the investigational group (p = 0.025). No difference in TTD or the rate of minor complications was observed. This study demonstrates that in the aforementioned population, the D-Stat Dry bandage is safe and effective in reducing both TTH and TTA and results in improved patient satisfaction.

摘要

多种局部止血剂已被批准用于控制血管穿刺部位的表面出血。然而,这些装置中的大多数几乎没有临床数据支持其使用。本研究旨在评估新型商用D-Stat Dry止血绷带与标准护理手法压迫相比的疗效和安全性。在接受经股动脉途径的诊断性心导管检查或外周血管造影的患者中进行了一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。受试者被随机分为接受D-Stat Dry绷带作为手法压迫辅助的组或仅接受手法压迫的组。主要终点是止血时间(TTH)和主要并发症。次要终点包括次要并发症、患者满意度、下床活动时间(TTA)和出院时间(TTD)。376名具有相似基线特征的受试者(189名对照组,187名试验组)参与了该研究。平均年龄为61.5岁,男性占比58%。试验组的TTH显著更低(7.8分钟对13.0分钟;p = 0.001)。两组之间未观察到主要并发症发生率的差异。平均TTA(试验组为392分钟,对照组为415分钟;p = 0.023)和患者满意度显著有利于试验组(p = 0.025)。未观察到TTD或次要并发症发生率的差异。本研究表明,在上述人群中,D-Stat Dry绷带在降低TTH和TTA方面是安全有效的,并能提高患者满意度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验