Suppr超能文献

一项关于经皮冠状动脉和外周介入术后使用局部止血贴的前瞻性随机试验。

A prospective, randomized trial of topical hemostasis patch use following percutaneous coronary and peripheral intervention.

作者信息

Narins Craig R, Zareba Wojciech, Rocco Vicki, McNitt Scott

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Nov;20(11):579-84.

Abstract

The use of topical hemostasis patches has grown rapidly despite a paucity of evidence supporting their clinical utility. We performed a randomized, controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a topical hemostasis patch as a means to accelerate vascular hemostasis following percutaneous intervention. One hundred fifty (150) patients undergoing coronary or peripheral intervention through a 6 Fr femoral arterial sheath were randomized to sheath removal with either: (1) manual pressure and adjunctive use of a patch incorporating a polysaccharide based procoagulant material (SafeSeal Patch, Possis Medical Inc.); or (2) conventional manual pressure alone. Sheaths were removed when the activated clotting time (ACT) fell to < or = 250 seconds. Patients ambulated 2 hours after hemostasis was achieved. Time to hemostasis (duration of compression required until cessation of bleeding following sheath removal) was significantly lower in the hemostasis patch arm (11.8 +/- 3.6 vs. 13.8 +/- 5.8 minutes; p = 0.02). Attainment of hemostasis in < 15 minutes was also more likely among patients randomized to the hemostasis patch rather than manual compression alone (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% confidence intervals 1.2, 5.1; p = 0.014). The median time to ambulation (total duration from the end of the interventional procedure to ambulation) was significantly reduced among patients in the hemostasis patch arm (2.8 vs. 3.8 hours; p = 0.03). Bleeding complications were uncommon and did not differ between the study arms. In conclusion, this trial supports the concept that the polysaccharide-based SafeSeal Patch enhances access site hemostasis following endovascular intervention.

摘要

尽管支持局部止血贴临床效用的证据不足,但局部止血贴的使用仍迅速增加。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估局部止血贴作为经皮介入后加速血管止血手段的疗效。150例通过6F股动脉鞘进行冠状动脉或外周介入的患者被随机分为两组,分别采用以下方法拔除鞘管:(1)手动压迫并辅助使用含有多糖类促凝材料的止血贴(SafeSeal止血贴,Possis Medical公司);或(2)仅采用传统手动压迫。当活化凝血时间(ACT)降至≤250秒时拔除鞘管。止血成功后2小时让患者下床活动。止血贴组的止血时间(拔除鞘管后直至出血停止所需的压迫持续时间)显著缩短(11.8±3.6分钟 vs. 13.8±5.8分钟;p = 0.02)。随机接受止血贴治疗的患者比仅接受手动压迫的患者更有可能在15分钟内实现止血(优势比 = 2.5;95%置信区间1.2, 5.1;p = 0.014)。止血贴组患者的中位下床活动时间(从介入手术结束到下床活动的总时长)显著缩短(2.8小时 vs. 3.8小时;p = 0.03)。出血并发症并不常见,且两组之间无差异。总之,该试验支持以下观点:基于多糖的SafeSeal止血贴可增强血管内介入后穿刺部位的止血效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验