Boyce Paul
Thomas Coram Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, UK.
Med Anthropol. 2007 Apr-Jun;26(2):175-203. doi: 10.1080/01459740701285582.
HIV prevention with men who have sex with men in India has, in large part, been premised on the reification of "cultural categories"--kothi being among the most popularized terms in this context, broadly designating men who have a feminine sense of self and who enact "passive" sexual roles. Countering prevailing research trends, this article explores ways in which local, national, and global processes inform contemporary kothi sexual subjectivities--disrupting simplistic perspectives on the cultural coherence of the category. Derivative uses of anthropological knowledge in public health and activist milieux are seen to have propounded limited representations of men who have sex with men in India. Drawing on ethnographic research in Calcutta, conceptualization of time in ethnography is examined and a critique of positivist epistemologies is put forward as a basis for advancing more conceptually cogent and effective HIV prevention research and programming strategies, especially those that aim to address sexuality between men.
在印度,针对男男性行为者的艾滋病预防工作在很大程度上是以“文化类别”的具体化作为前提的——在这种背景下,“kothi”是最广为流传的术语之一,大致指那些具有女性自我意识且扮演“被动”性角色的男性。与主流研究趋势不同,本文探讨了地方、国家和全球进程如何影响当代kothi的性主体性——打破了对该类别文化一致性的简单化看法。公共卫生和激进主义环境中对人类学知识的衍生性运用,被认为对印度男男性行为者的描述有限。基于对加尔各答的人种志研究,本文审视了人种志中时间的概念化,并提出对实证主义认识论的批判,以此作为推进更具概念说服力和有效性的艾滋病预防研究及项目策略的基础,尤其是那些旨在解决男性之间性行为问题的策略。