James Lori E, Fogler Kethera A
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Memory. 2007 May;15(4):366-74. doi: 10.1080/09658210701307077.
Two theoretical frameworks relevant to proper name learning in ageing make competing predictions about the effects of name frequency. Under an inhibition model, common (high-frequency; HF) proper names will be harder to learn and remember than rare (low-frequency; LF) names, whereas under a transmission deficit model, HF names will have the advantage. Young adults (ages 18-31) and two groups of healthy older adults (ages 60-74 and 75-89) learned HF (e.g., Davis) and LF (e.g., Davin) surnames in association with new faces. Young adults recalled more names than older or oldest adults, and participants of all ages recalled more HF than LF names. There was no interaction between age and name frequency: The difference favouring HF names was similar in magnitude across age groups. All evidence runs contrary to the inhibitory model's prediction that interference makes learning HF names difficult.
与衰老过程中专有名词学习相关的两个理论框架,对名字频率的影响做出了相互矛盾的预测。在抑制模型下,常见(高频;HF)专有名词比罕见(低频;LF)名字更难学习和记忆,而在传递缺陷模型下,高频名字将具有优势。年轻成年人(18 - 31岁)和两组健康的老年人(60 - 74岁和75 - 89岁)学习与新面孔相关的高频(如戴维斯)和低频(如达文)姓氏。年轻成年人比年长或最年长的成年人回忆起更多的名字,并且所有年龄段的参与者回忆起的高频名字都比低频名字多。年龄和名字频率之间没有交互作用:在各年龄组中,有利于高频名字的差异在大小上相似。所有证据都与抑制模型的预测相反,即干扰会使学习高频名字变得困难。