Suppr超能文献

[19世纪荷兰及其殖民地对麻风病病因认知的贡献]

[Contributions of the Netherlands and its colonies to the knowledge of the cause of leprosy in the 19th century].

作者信息

Menke H E, Wille R J B, Faber W R, Pieters T

机构信息

Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, afd. Dermatologie, Rotterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Apr 7;151(14):825-30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the Dutch contributions to the formulation of the concept that leprosy is an infectious disease.

DESIGN

Literature study.

METHOD

A search for relevant publications was made in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch journal of Medicine; NTvG) and the Geneeskundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-Indië (Medical Journal of the Dutch Indies; GTNI) with the aid of the search terms 'lepra [leprosy]', 'lepra Arabum [Arab leprosy]', 'melaatsheid [leprosy]' and 'elephantiasis Graecorum [Greek elephantiasis]'. In addition, on the basis of references in the publications in the NTvG and the GTNI, as well as via searches in the catalogues of the Royal Library in The Hague and the libraries of Dutch universities, an inventory was made of the Dutch medical dissertations and other monographs on leprosy, as well as the medical historical review articles, from the 19th century.

RESULTS

For a long time, physicians described the aetiology of leprosy in terms of 'a substrate' to which all sorts of mixtures of infection, heredity and hygiene contributed. From the middle of the 19th century onwards, this explanatory model with multiple possible solutions gave way to a controversy between two explanatory models: heredity as an 'anti-contagious' principle versus contagiosity. These two explanatory models were mutually exclusive in their universal aspirations. The debate in the Netherlands took place in the field of tension between European concepts on the one hand and on the other hand ideas and practices resulting from the interaction between the Netherlands and its colonies. Inspired in part by the writings of the Dutch physician C L Drognat Landré, who based his contagion theory on observations in Surinam, the Norwegian G. H. A. Hansen discovered the leprosy bacillus in 1873. It was not until 1897, at the international leprosy conference in Berlin, however, that consensus was to be reached on leprosy being an infectious disease.

CONCLUSION

An essential contribution to the development of the contemporary ideas as to the cause of leprosy was made from the Netherlands.

摘要

目的

确定荷兰在麻风病是一种传染病这一概念形成过程中的贡献。

设计

文献研究。

方法

借助搜索词“lepra [麻风病]”、“lepra Arabum [阿拉伯麻风病]”、“melaatsheid [麻风病]”和“elephantiasis Graecorum [希腊象皮病]”,在《荷兰医学杂志》(Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde;NTvG)和《荷属东印度医学杂志》(Geneeskundig Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-Indië;GTNI)中搜索相关出版物。此外,根据NTvG和GTNI出版物中的参考文献,以及通过在海牙皇家图书馆目录和荷兰大学图书馆中进行搜索,对19世纪荷兰关于麻风病的医学博士论文及其他专著以及医学史综述文章进行了清查。

结果

长期以来,医生们用“一种基质”来描述麻风病的病因,感染、遗传和卫生的各种因素都与之相关。从19世纪中叶起,这种具有多种可能解释的模式被两种解释模式之间的争论所取代:遗传作为一种“反传染”原则与传染性。这两种解释模式在其普遍适用性方面相互排斥。荷兰的这场辩论发生在欧洲观念与荷兰与其殖民地之间相互作用所产生的观念和实践这两者之间的紧张领域。部分受到荷兰医生C.L.德罗格纳特·兰德雷著作的启发,他的传染理论基于在苏里南的观察,挪威的G.H.A.汉森于1873年发现了麻风杆菌。然而,直到1897年在柏林召开的国际麻风病会议上,才就麻风病是一种传染病达成共识。

结论

荷兰对当代关于麻风病病因的观念发展做出了重要贡献。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验