• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越披露:生物医学研究中信任的必要性。

Beyond disclosure: the necessity of trust in biomedical research.

作者信息

Kahn Jeffrey P

机构信息

Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Cleve Clin J Med. 2007 Mar;74 Suppl 2:S49-50; discussion S51-9. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.74.suppl_2.s49.

DOI:10.3949/ccjm.74.suppl_2.s49
PMID:17469474
Abstract

Biomedical research is experiencing a crisis in public trust. Although the vast majority of clinical studies are conducted in an ethical fashion, public perceptions are fueled by well-publicized examples of unethical practices. Mistrust is further encouraged by the duality of the role of the clinical researcher, who is charged with both caring for patients and answering a research question. Disclosure is not adequate to fully address conflicts of interest in biomedical research; instead, efforts to protect patients' interests and enhance trust should combine disclosure with an attempt to reduce conflicts in the first place as much as possible.

摘要

生物医学研究正面临公众信任危机。尽管绝大多数临床研究都是以符合伦理的方式进行的,但不道德行为的公开实例加剧了公众的看法。临床研究人员角色的双重性进一步助长了不信任,临床研究人员既要负责照顾患者,又要回答研究问题。披露不足以充分解决生物医学研究中的利益冲突;相反,保护患者利益和增强信任的努力应将披露与尽可能从源头上减少冲突的尝试结合起来。

相似文献

1
Beyond disclosure: the necessity of trust in biomedical research.超越披露:生物医学研究中信任的必要性。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2007 Mar;74 Suppl 2:S49-50; discussion S51-9. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.74.suppl_2.s49.
2
Conflicts of interest at the NIH--resolving the problem.美国国立卫生研究院的利益冲突——解决问题
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 2;351(10):955-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048235.
3
Research accountability and financial conflicts of interest in industry-sponsored clinical research: a review.行业资助的临床研究中的研究责任与财务利益冲突:一项综述
Account Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;10(3):137-58. doi: 10.1080/714906093.
4
Prologue: a case study in biomedical conflicts.前言:生物医学冲突的一个案例研究
Cleve Clin J Med. 2007 Mar;74 Suppl 2:S8-9; discussion 16-22. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.74.suppl_2.s8.
5
Science on trial: conflicts of interest jeopardize scientific integrity and public health.受审的科学:利益冲突危及科学诚信与公众健康。
Genewatch. 2003 Sep-Oct;16(5):3-6.
6
NerveCenter: Office of Inspector General warns NIH on lax COI oversight as many academic medical centers look inward.神经中枢:随着许多学术医疗中心进行自查,美国监察长办公室就国立卫生研究院对利益冲突监督不力发出警告。
Ann Neurol. 2010 Mar;67(3):A7-A10. doi: 10.1002/ana.22026.
7
Innovation incentives or corrupt conflicts of interest? Moving beyond Jekyll and Hyde in regulating biomedical academic-industry relationships.创新激励还是腐败利益冲突?超越杰基尔与海德模式来规范生物医学学术-产业关系。
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2013 Winter;13(1):135-97.
8
Ten steps to developing a national agenda to address financial conflicts of interest in industry sponsored clinical research.制定国家议程以解决行业资助临床研究中经济利益冲突的十个步骤。
Account Res. 2005 Apr-Jun;12(2):139-55. doi: 10.1080/08989620590957229.
9
Policies of academic medical centers for disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants.学术医疗中心向潜在研究参与者披露经济利益冲突的政策。
Acad Med. 2006 Feb;81(2):113-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200602000-00003.
10
Ethics. Private money, public disclosure.伦理。私人资金,公开披露。
Science. 2009 Jul 3;325(5936):28-30. doi: 10.1126/science.325_28.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and acceptability of a structured quality by design approach to enhancing the rigor of clinical studies at an academic health center.一种基于设计质量的结构化方法在提高学术健康中心临床研究严谨性方面的可行性和可接受性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Aug 13;5(1):e175. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.837. eCollection 2021.
2
Safety in human research: past problems and current challenges from a Canadian perspective.人体研究中的安全性:从加拿大视角看过去的问题与当前的挑战
HEC Forum. 2008 Sep;20(3):277-90. doi: 10.1007/s10730-008-9076-3.