Rockwood Kenneth
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2007 Mar;34 Suppl 1:S52-6. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100005576.
The use of judgment-based global measures of clinical treatment effects has a long history in the regulatory approval of drugs for the treatment of dementia. This paper reviews current use of these measures, noting several practical difficulties with their implementation. Importantly, global measures have usually yielded general estimates of drug effects similar to psychometric test batteries, even though correlations between global and psychometric measures at the individual patient level is modest. Like psychometric tests, global measures can tell us that some clinically detectable effect is present but often yield only limited evidence about what those effects might be. Steps should be taken to improve the specificity of treatment effect description and to incorporate patient/caregiver preferences in global measures about disease treatment in dementia.
基于判断的临床治疗效果整体评估方法在痴呆症治疗药物的监管审批中有着悠久的历史。本文回顾了这些评估方法的当前应用情况,并指出了其实施过程中的一些实际困难。重要的是,整体评估方法通常得出的药物效果总体估计与心理测量测试组合相似,尽管在个体患者层面,整体评估与心理测量评估之间的相关性并不高。与心理测量测试一样,整体评估方法可以告诉我们存在一些临床可检测到的效果,但通常只能提供关于这些效果可能是什么的有限证据。应该采取措施提高治疗效果描述的特异性,并将患者/照顾者的偏好纳入痴呆症疾病治疗的整体评估中。