Weiss Daniel S
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2007 May;133(3):529-32; author reply 533-4. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.3.529.
Levin and Nielsen (2007) presented a review of research emphasizing dreams whose content is distressing. With some broad conclusions about factors important in the understanding of distressing dreams as a springboard, the authors offered potential explanatory mechanisms for distressing dreams that range from brain structures to personality variables, drawing heavily on findings about posttraumatic stress disorder. Though a reasonable case is made for elements of the argument, implications from one perspective are not always considered in making the argument for others, issues that follow logically from certain assertions are not discussed, and certain assumptions appear unjustified. Definitional or phenomenological presentations are not always consistent, making it difficult to determine the real nature of the variables being offered and to get a clear sense of the boundaries of the model.
莱文和尼尔森(2007年)发表了一篇综述,着重探讨内容令人困扰的梦境研究。作者以一些关于理解令人困扰的梦境的重要因素的宽泛结论为出发点,从脑结构到人格变量,提出了一系列关于令人困扰的梦境的潜在解释机制,大量借鉴了创伤后应激障碍的研究结果。尽管该论点的某些要素有一定道理,但在为其他观点进行论证时,并非总是考虑到一个观点的影响,对于某些断言逻辑上随之而来的问题未进行讨论,而且某些假设似乎不合理。定义性或现象学的表述并不总是一致,这使得难以确定所提出变量的真实性质,也难以清晰了解该模型的边界。