Jackson Sue, Scambler Graham
Centre for Behavioural and Social Sciences in Medicine, UCL, London.
Sociol Health Illn. 2007 Apr;29(3):412-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00494.x.
Acupuncture and other types of 'complementary and alternative medicine' (CAM) are proving increasingly popular in the UK. As attempts to incorporate acupuncture into allopathic medicine have grown in number, the issue of assessing its effectiveness in ways consistent with the concept of evidence-based medicine has become more urgent. The nature, relevance and applicability of such assessments remain controversial however. This paper reports a qualitative study of acupuncturists' own perceptions of evidence and evidence-based medicine in relation to their therapeutic interventions. The material is presented in two main sections: explaining how acupuncture works, and resisting evidence-based medicine. The interviews reveal a great deal of scepticism and ambivalence and a deep questioning of the salience of conventional (biomedical) modes of evaluation of interventions.
针灸及其他类型的“补充与替代医学”(CAM)在英国越来越受欢迎。随着将针灸纳入现代医学的尝试越来越多,以符合循证医学概念的方式评估其有效性的问题变得更加紧迫。然而,此类评估的性质、相关性和适用性仍存在争议。本文报告了一项关于针灸师对与治疗干预相关的证据和循证医学自身看法的定性研究。材料分为两个主要部分:解释针灸的作用方式以及对循证医学的抵制。访谈揭示了大量的怀疑和矛盾情绪,以及对传统(生物医学)干预评估模式重要性的深刻质疑。