Seyler Thorsten M, Cui Quanjun, Mihalko William M, Mont Michael A, Saleh Khaled J
Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Instr Course Lect. 2007;56:221-33.
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a devastating disease for which many patients will eventually require total hip arthroplasty. Standard total hip arthroplasties have historically had poor results in patients with osteonecrosis. More recently, reports have shown excellent results with second- and third-generation designs that incorporate advances in bearing technology. However, there are still certain subpopulations of patients (those with sickle cell disease, those with systemic lupus erythematosus, and those who have undergone renal transplantation) that have less than optimal results. Other hip arthroplasty alternatives include bipolar hemiarthroplasty, limited femoral resurfacing, and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty historically and currently has consistently poor results in most studies and should be avoided in patients with osteonecrosis. In multiple reports, limited femoral arthroplasty has demonstrated reasonable midterm and long-term outcomes as a temporizing procedure, with results being less predictable than for standard total hip arthroplasty. Recently, ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty has emerged as a viable option that has been used to treat patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and several studies have shown promising short-term outcomes. Overall, however, recent studies have shown more optimal outcomes with hip arthroplasty than resurfacing hip arthroplasty, which makes standard hip replacements, as well as other arthroplasty alternatives, more attractive for young patients with this disease.
股骨头坏死是一种严重的疾病,许多患者最终需要进行全髋关节置换术。从历史上看,标准的全髋关节置换术在股骨头坏死患者中的效果不佳。最近,有报告显示,采用了先进轴承技术的第二代和第三代设计取得了优异的效果。然而,仍有某些亚组患者(镰状细胞病患者、系统性红斑狼疮患者以及接受过肾移植的患者)的治疗效果不尽人意。其他髋关节置换术选择包括双极半髋关节置换术、有限股骨头表面置换术和金属对金属表面置换术。在大多数研究中,双极半髋关节置换术无论在过去还是现在,效果一直都很差,股骨头坏死患者应避免使用。在多篇报告中,有限股骨头置换术作为一种临时手术,已显示出合理的中期和长期效果,但其结果比标准全髋关节置换术更难预测。最近,陶瓷对陶瓷和金属对金属表面置换髋关节置换术已成为治疗股骨头坏死患者的一种可行选择,多项研究显示了令人鼓舞的短期效果。然而,总体而言,最近的研究表明,髋关节置换术的效果优于表面置换髋关节置换术,这使得标准髋关节置换术以及其他置换术选择对患有这种疾病的年轻患者更具吸引力。