Bono Christopher M, Vaccaro Alexander R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 May;20(3):255-61. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180331352.
A growing number of interspinous process devices have been introduced to the lumbar spine implant market. Implant designs vary from static spacers to dynamized devices. Furthermore, they are composed of a range of different materials including bone allograft, titanium, polyetheretherketone, and elastomeric compounds. The common link between them is the mechanical goal of distracting the spinous processes to affect the intervertebral relationship. In contrast, the purported clinical goals are more variable, ranging from treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis, discogenic low back pain, facet syndrome, disk herniations, and instability. Though some clinical data exist for some of these devices, defining the indications for these minimally invasive procedures will be crucial. Indications should emerge from thoughtful consideration of data from randomized controlled studies.
越来越多的棘突间装置已进入腰椎植入物市场。植入物设计从静态间隔器到动态装置各不相同。此外,它们由一系列不同材料组成,包括同种异体骨、钛、聚醚醚酮和弹性体化合物。它们之间的共同联系是使棘突分离以影响椎间关系的机械目标。相比之下,所谓的临床目标则更多样化,包括治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症、椎间盘源性下腰痛、小关节综合征、椎间盘突出症和脊柱不稳。尽管其中一些装置有一些临床数据,但明确这些微创手术的适应症至关重要。适应症应来自对随机对照研究数据的深入思考。