Zhang Shuyi, Zhang Yilong, Huang Licai, Zhang Shuao, Lu Chenshui, Liu Zhengpeng, Kang Chan, Wang Zhao
Department of Orthopedics, Fuzhou Second Hospital, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian, China.
Department of Spine Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College, Chengde, 067000, Hebei, China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43399-x.
Multi-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, including intersegmental disc degeneration, is found in clinical practice. Controversy still exists regarding the treatment for cross-segment degeneration. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) with several internal fixations was used to treat cross-segment lumbar degenerative disease. A whole lumbar spine model was extracted from CT images of the whole lumbar spine of patients with lumbar degeneration. The L2-3 and L4-5 intervertebral spaces were fused with OLIF using modeling software, the Pedicle screws were performed on L2-3 and L4-5, and different internal fixations were performed on L3-4 in Finite Element (FE) software. Among the six 10 Nm moments of different directions, the L3-4 no surgery (NS) group had the relatively largest Range of Motion (ROM) in the whole lumbar spine, while the L2-5 Long segmental fixation (LSF)group had the smallest ROM and the other groups had similar ROM. The ROM in the L1-2 and L5-S1 was relatively close in the six group models, and the articular cartilage stress and disc stress on the L1-2 and L5-S1 were relatively close. In contrast, the L3-4 ROM differed relatively greatly, with the LSF ROM the smallest and the NS ROM the largest, and the L3-4 Coflex (Coflex) group more active than the L3-4 Bacfuse (Bacfuse) group and the L3-4 translaminar facet screw fixation (TFSF) group. The stress on the articular cartilage and disc at L3-4 was relatively greater in the NS disc and articular cartilage, and greater in the Coflex group than in the Bacfuse and TFSF groups, with the greatest stress on the internal fixation in the TFSF group, followed by the Coflex group, and relatively similar stress in the Bacfuse, LSF, and NS groups. In the TFSF group, the stress on the internal fixation was greater than the yield strength among different directional moments of 10 Nm, which means it is unsuitable to be an internal fixation. The LSF group had the greatest overall ROM, which may lead to postoperative low back discomfort. The NS group has the greatest overall ROM, but its increased stress on the L3-4 disc and articular cartilage may lead to accelerated degeneration of the L3-4 disc and articular cartilage. The Coflex and Bacfuse groups had a reduced L3-4 ROM but a greater stress on disc compared to the LSF group, which may lead to disc degeneration in the long term. However, their stress on the articular cartilage was relatively low. Coflex and Bacfuse can still be considered better surgical options.
临床实践中发现多节段腰椎退行性疾病,包括节段间椎间盘退变。关于跨节段退变的治疗仍存在争议。采用斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)联合多种内固定治疗跨节段腰椎退行性疾病。从腰椎退变患者的全腰椎CT图像中提取整个腰椎模型。使用建模软件对L2-3和L4-5椎间间隙进行OLIF融合,在有限元(FE)软件中对L2-3和L4-5进行椎弓根螺钉置入,并对L3-4进行不同的内固定。在六个不同方向的10 Nm力矩中,L3-4未手术(NS)组在整个腰椎中的活动范围(ROM)相对最大,而L2-5长节段固定(LSF)组的ROM最小,其他组的ROM相似。在六组模型中,L1-2和L5-S1的ROM相对接近,L1-2和L5-S1的关节软骨应力和椎间盘应力也相对接近。相比之下,L3-4的ROM差异相对较大,LSF组的ROM最小,NS组的ROM最大,L3-4 Coflex组比L3-4 Bacfuse组和L3-4经椎板小关节螺钉固定(TFSF)组更活跃。NS组椎间盘和关节软骨中L3-4处的关节软骨和椎间盘应力相对较大,Coflex组比Bacfuse组和TFSF组更大,TFSF组内固定应力最大,其次是Coflex组,Bacfuse组、LSF组和NS组应力相对相似。在TFSF组中,在10 Nm的不同方向力矩下,内固定应力大于屈服强度,这意味着它不适合作为内固定。LSF组的整体ROM最大,这可能导致术后下腰部不适。NS组的整体ROM最大,但其L3-4椎间盘和关节软骨应力增加可能导致L3-4椎间盘和关节软骨加速退变。Coflex组和Bacfuse组L3-4的ROM减小,但与LSF组相比,椎间盘应力更大,从长期来看可能导致椎间盘退变。然而,它们对关节软骨的应力相对较低。Coflex和Bacfuse仍可被认为是较好的手术选择。