Suppr超能文献

自我报告有踝关节不稳定的受试者的动态姿势稳定性缺陷。

Dynamic postural stability deficits in subjects with self-reported ankle instability.

作者信息

Wikstrom Erik A, Tillman Mark D, Chmielewski Terese L, Cauraugh James H, Borsa Paul A

机构信息

Center for Exercise Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8205, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Mar;39(3):397-402. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31802d3460.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A limited understanding of how functional ankle instability (FAI) affects dynamic postural stability exists because of a lack of reliable and valid measures. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a new reliable index for dynamic postural stability could differentiate between those with stable ankles and those with FAI.

METHODS

Data were collected on 108 subjects (54 subjects with stable ankles (STABLE group); 54 subjects with functionally unstable ankles (FAI group)). Subjects performed a single-leg-hop stabilization maneuver in which they stood 70 cm from the center of a force plate, jumped off both legs, touched a designated marker placed at a height equivalent to 50% of their maximum vertical leap, and landed on a single leg. The dynamic postural stability index and directional stability indices (medial/lateral, anterior/posterior, and vertical) were calculated. The raw and normalized (to energy dissipated) indices were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Significant differences were noted for the anterior/posterior stability index (FAI = 0.36 +/- 0.09, STABLE = 0.30 +/- 0.06). Similar results were seen for the vertical stability index (FAI = 0.73 +/- 0.17, STABLE = 0.61 +/- 0.13), the normalized dynamic postural stability index (FAI = 0.85 +/- 0.17, STABLE = 0.73 +/- 0.12), the normalized vertical stability index (FAI = 0.007 +/- 0.004, STABLE = 0.005 +/- 0.001), and the dynamic postural stability index (FAI = 0.008 +/- 0.003, STABLE = 0.006 +/- 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the dynamic postural stability index is a sensitive measure of dynamic postural stability and is capable of detecting differences between individuals with stable ankles and individuals with functionally unstable ankles.

摘要

目的

由于缺乏可靠且有效的测量方法,目前对于功能性踝关节不稳(FAI)如何影响动态姿势稳定性的了解有限。因此,本研究的目的是确定一种新的动态姿势稳定性可靠指标能否区分踝关节稳定者和功能性踝关节不稳者。

方法

收集了108名受试者的数据(54名踝关节稳定的受试者(稳定组);54名功能性踝关节不稳的受试者(FAI组))。受试者进行单腿跳稳定动作,即他们站在距测力台中心70厘米处,双腿起跳,触碰一个放置在相当于其最大垂直跳跃高度50%处的指定标记,然后单腿落地。计算动态姿势稳定性指数和方向稳定性指数(内侧/外侧、前后和垂直方向)。比较两组之间的原始指数和归一化(相对于能量消散)指数。

结果

前后稳定性指数存在显著差异(FAI组=0.36±0.09,稳定组=0.30±0.06)。垂直稳定性指数(FAI组=0.73±0.17,稳定组=0.61±0.13)、归一化动态姿势稳定性指数(FAI组=0.85±0.17,稳定组=0.73±0.12)、归一化垂直稳定性指数(FAI组=0.007±0.004,稳定组=0.005±0.001)和动态姿势稳定性指数(FAI组=0.008±0.003,稳定组=0.006±0.001)也有类似结果。

结论

这些结果表明,动态姿势稳定性指数是动态姿势稳定性的一种敏感测量指标,能够检测出踝关节稳定者和功能性踝关节不稳者之间的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验