Baird Donald J, Burton G Allen, Culp Joseph M, Maltby Lorraine
National Water Research Institute (Environment Canada) at Canadian Rivers Institute, Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, PO Box 45111, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 6E1, Canada.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2007 Apr;3(2):275-8. doi: 10.1897/ieam_2006-030.1.
The objective of a SETAC Pellston Workshop held in Portland, Oregon, USA, in November 2004 was to evaluate the use of field-based biological effects and exposure techniques in the hazard and risk assessment of aquatic ecosystems, thereby improving the accuracy and relevance of the decision-making process. This objective was addressed by keynote presentations outlining the state of the science and providing case studies, followed by work-group discussions focusing on 4 main areas: 1) Improving stressor-effect diagnostic capability in the assessment process; 2) maximizing efficiency, quality assurance and quality control, and broad-scale applicability of in situ field bioassays and experimental approaches; 3) determining the ecological relevance and consequences of individual and food chain-based effect measures; and 4) incorporating results from field-based effect methods into a weight-of-evidence decision-making process. Major outcomes from group discussions are highlighted, and future priorities for research in this area are recommended.
2004年11月在美国俄勒冈州波特兰市举办的SETAC佩尔斯顿研讨会的目标是评估在水生生态系统危害和风险评估中基于实地的生物效应和暴露技术的使用情况,从而提高决策过程的准确性和相关性。该目标通过主题演讲得以实现,这些演讲概述了科学现状并提供了案例研究,随后是专注于4个主要领域的工作组讨论:1)在评估过程中提高应激源-效应诊断能力;2)最大限度地提高原位实地生物测定和实验方法的效率、质量保证和质量控制以及广泛适用性;3)确定个体和基于食物链的效应测量的生态相关性和后果;4)将基于实地的效应方法的结果纳入证据权重决策过程。文中突出了小组讨论的主要成果,并推荐了该领域未来的研究重点。