Bolser D C, Hobbs S F, Chandler M J, Foreman R D
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Brain Res. 1991 Aug 23;557(1-2):162-6. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90130-n.
Studies were conducted to determine if electrical or mechanical stimulation of phrenic afferent fibers (PHR) would inhibit the activity of lumbosacral spinothalamic tract (STT) neurons. Twelve monkeys were anesthetized, paralyzed, and artificially ventilated. Extracellular action potentials were recorded from 78 STT neurons located in L2-S3 spinal segments. Electrical stimulation of PHR reduced the activity of 65%, did not affect 33%, and excited 1% of STT neurons. Mechanical stimulation of the diaphragm reduced the activity of 63%, did not effect 34%, and excited 1% of lumbosacral STT neurons. Distention of the urinary bladder (UBD) inhibited 52%, did not affect 23%, excited 23%, and elicited a biphasic response in 1% of STT neurons. However, there was no correlation between the effect of PHR and UBD or somatic classification of the neurons. We conclude that electrical or mechanical stimulation of PHR can produce a generalized inhibition of lumbosacral STT neurons. This inhibitory effect of PHR is similar to inhibitory effects reported for a variety of other afferent systems.
开展了多项研究以确定对膈传入纤维(PHR)进行电刺激或机械刺激是否会抑制腰骶部脊髓丘脑束(STT)神经元的活动。12只猴子被麻醉、麻痹并进行人工通气。从位于L2 - S3脊髓节段的78个STT神经元记录细胞外动作电位。对PHR进行电刺激使65%的STT神经元活动降低,33%未受影响,1%被兴奋。对膈进行机械刺激使63%的腰骶部STT神经元活动降低,34%未受影响,1%被兴奋。膀胱扩张(UBD)使52%的STT神经元活动受到抑制,23%未受影响,23%被兴奋,1%引发双相反应。然而,PHR的效应与UBD之间以及神经元的躯体分类之间均无相关性。我们得出结论,对PHR进行电刺激或机械刺激可对腰骶部STT神经元产生广泛抑制。PHR的这种抑制作用类似于针对多种其他传入系统所报道的抑制作用。