Melin Petter, Sundh Ingvar, Håkansson Sebastian, Schnürer Johan
Department of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7025, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden.
Biotechnol Lett. 2007 Aug;29(8):1147-54. doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9375-9. Epub 2007 May 4.
During storage of moist animal feed, growth of detrimental fungi causing spoilage, or being mycotoxigenic or pathogenic, is a severe problem. Addition of biopreservative yeasts or lactic acid bacteria can significantly reduce this problem. However, their use requires several careful considerations. One is the safety to the animal, humans and the environment, tightly connected to legal aspects and the need for pre-market authorisation when supplementing feed with microorganisms. Although both yeasts and lactic acid bacteria are considered comparatively safe organisms due to low production of toxic metabolites, it is of great importance to understand the mechanisms behind the biopreservative abilities. Another important issue concerns practical aspects, such as the economic production of large amounts of the organisms and the development of a suitable formulation giving the organisms a long shelf life. These aspects are discussed and a recommendation of this review is that both safety and formulation aspects of a specific microbe should be considered at an early stage in the selection of new organisms with biopreservation potential.
在潮湿动物饲料的储存过程中,导致饲料变质、产生霉菌毒素或具有致病性的有害真菌生长是一个严重问题。添加生物防腐剂酵母或乳酸菌可显著减少这一问题。然而,其使用需要仔细考虑几个方面。一是对动物、人类和环境的安全性,这与法律层面以及在饲料中添加微生物时的上市前授权需求紧密相关。尽管酵母和乳酸菌由于有毒代谢产物产量低而被认为是相对安全的生物体,但了解生物防腐能力背后的机制非常重要。另一个重要问题涉及实际方面,例如大量生产这些生物体的经济性以及开发能使这些生物体具有较长保质期的合适配方。本文对这些方面进行了讨论,本综述的建议是,在选择具有生物防腐潜力的新生物体的早期阶段,应考虑特定微生物的安全性和配方方面。