de Wit J J, van de Sande H W A, Counotte G H M, Wellenberg G J
GD, Animal Health Service Ltd. AA Deventer, The Netherlands.
Avian Pathol. 2007 Apr;36(2):177-83. doi: 10.1080/03079450601105676.
The results of global proficiency testing schemes (PTS) for serological tests to detect antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) in chicken serum, in which 125 and 120 laboratories, respectively, participated from Africa, Asia, Europe, Central and South America, were used to analyse the performances of different antibody test systems such as virus neutralization tests, haemagglutination inhibition tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and agar gel precipitation tests. All laboratories were asked to carry out their routine diagnostic tests for the detection of IBDV and NDV antibodies as usual. This global ring trial provided a large amount of data on variation within and between laboratories and test systems used worldwide. The data showed that the variation between the quantitative test results of different laboratories (R(between)) using the IBDV virus neutralization tests and the NDV haemagglutination inhibition test was higher (about double) compared with the variation within commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay systems. Although both tests are often referred to and used as the "gold standard" in experimental and scientific studies, official procedures and for the validation of tests, this study shows that there is an urgent need for a global implementation of recommended test procedures and/or the inclusion of international reference sera in these studies.
全球能力验证计划(PTS)对鸡血清中检测传染性法氏囊病病毒(IBDV)和新城疫病毒(NDV)抗体的血清学检测结果进行了分析,来自非洲、亚洲、欧洲、中美洲和南美洲的125个和120个实验室分别参与了该计划,用于分析不同抗体检测系统的性能,如病毒中和试验、血凝抑制试验、酶联免疫吸附测定和琼脂凝胶沉淀试验。所有实验室都被要求像往常一样进行检测IBDV和NDV抗体的常规诊断试验。这项全球循环试验提供了大量关于全球范围内各实验室以及所使用的检测系统内部和之间差异的数据。数据表明,与商业酶联免疫吸附测定系统内部的差异相比,使用IBDV病毒中和试验和NDV血凝抑制试验的不同实验室定量检测结果之间的差异(R(实验室间))更高(约为两倍)。尽管这两种试验在实验和科学研究、官方程序以及试验验证中经常被提及并用作“金标准”,但本研究表明,迫切需要在全球范围内实施推荐的检测程序和/或将国际参考血清纳入这些研究。