• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用圆柱形和立方体椎间测试植入物的植入后MRI:MRI伪影中植入物形状、材料和体积的评估——一项体外研究。

Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.

作者信息

Ernstberger Thorsten, Heidrich Gabert, Buchhorn Gottfried

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Gottingen, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, 37075 Gottingen, Germany.

出版信息

Spine J. 2007 May-Jun;7(3):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.016
PMID:17482121
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Interbody spacers for anterior spine fusion are made of different materials, which can affect the postfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Susceptibility artifacts specially for metallic implants can decrease the image quality.

PURPOSE

This study focused on the influence of determined implant parameters like shape, implant volume, and implant material in MRI artifacting with regard to solid geometrical titanium and carbon test spacers.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A comparative study on an in vitro spine model. The study was performed at a university research facility.

METHODS

In this study we evaluated the postimplantation MRI scans of three determined cuboids and six cylinders, which were made of titanium alloy and carbon fiber reinforced polymer. MRI scans were carried out by using T1 turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences. The total artifact volume (TAV) as well as median artifact area (MAA) were calculated. Additionally the implant volume (IV)/TAV and cross-sectional area (CSA)/MAA relation were determined. Statistical analyses were calculated with the t test and Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Considering all test implants with an increasing implant size, the TAV and the MAA became significantly larger (p<.001) with simultaneous reduction of the IV/TAV and CSA/MAA relation. In contrast to the carbon implant group, for titanium cylinders with an implant volume equivalent to the cuboids significant differences in MRI artifacting (p<.05) could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Susceptibility artifacts were clearly affected by the implant material, shape, and implant volume. Independent of the implant material, with regard to a more advantageous IV/TAV and CSA/MAA relation, for larger implants the artifact rate was more limited to the implant's direct surroundings. On the basis of a high magnetizability for titanium implants with an equal IV, the range of implant-related susceptibility artifacts was influenced by the material as well as implant shape in favor of cylindric implants. According to the very low MRI artifact rate of carbon implants, the implant shape did not have any significant effect on the artifact behavior.

摘要

背景

用于前路脊柱融合的椎间融合器由不同材料制成,这可能会影响融合后磁共振成像(MRI)扫描。特别是金属植入物的磁化伪影会降低图像质量。

目的

本研究聚焦于特定植入物参数(如形状、植入物体积和植入物材料)对实心几何形状钛和碳测试融合器在MRI伪影方面的影响。

研究设计/地点:对体外脊柱模型进行的比较研究。该研究在大学研究机构进行。

方法

在本研究中,我们评估了由钛合金和碳纤维增强聚合物制成的三个特定长方体和六个圆柱体植入后的MRI扫描。使用T1快速自旋回波(TSE)序列进行MRI扫描。计算总伪影体积(TAV)以及中位伪影面积(MAA)。此外,还确定了植入物体积(IV)/TAV和横截面积(CSA)/MAA的关系。使用t检验和Newman-Keuls检验进行多重比较的统计分析。

结果

考虑所有测试植入物,随着植入物尺寸增加,TAV和MAA显著增大(p<0.001),同时IV/TAV和CSA/MAA关系降低。与碳植入物组相比,对于植入物体积与长方体相当的钛圆柱体,在MRI伪影方面存在显著差异(p<0.05)。

结论

磁化伪影明显受植入物材料、形状和植入物体积影响。与植入物材料无关,就更有利的IV/TAV和CSA/MAA关系而言,对于较大的植入物,伪影率更多地局限于植入物的直接周围区域。基于相同IV的钛植入物具有高磁化率,与植入物相关的磁化伪影范围受材料以及植入物形状影响,有利于圆柱形植入物。根据碳植入物极低的MRI伪影率,植入物形状对伪影行为没有任何显著影响。

相似文献

1
Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.使用圆柱形和立方体椎间测试植入物的植入后MRI:MRI伪影中植入物形状、材料和体积的评估——一项体外研究。
Spine J. 2007 May-Jun;7(3):353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.016. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
2
In-vitro MRI detectability of interbody test spacers made of carbon fibre-reinforced polymers, titanium and titanium-coated carbon fibre-reinforced polymers.碳纤维增强聚合物、钛及钛涂层碳纤维增强聚合物制成的椎间测试垫片的体外磁共振成像可检测性
Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Apr;73(2):244-9.
3
Postfusion magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by a titanium, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and carbon intervertebral disc spacer.由钛、钴铬钼和碳制成的椎间融合器引起的融合后磁共振成像伪影。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Apr;20(2):154-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211244.52329.21.
4
The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.经观察者间验证的椎间融合器材料在磁共振成像伪影中的相关性。
Eur Spine J. 2007 Feb;16(2):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0064-5. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
5
Implant detectibility of intervertebral disc spacers in post fusion MRI: evaluation of the MRI scan quality by using a scoring system--an in vitro study.融合术后MRI中椎间盘间隔器的植入物可检测性:使用评分系统评估MRI扫描质量——一项体外研究
Neuroradiology. 2007 Feb;49(2):103-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0161-5. Epub 2006 Nov 4.
6
Artifacts in spine magnetic resonance imaging due to different intervertebral test spacers: an in vitro evaluation of magnesium versus titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers as biomaterials.不同椎间测试间隔器导致的脊柱磁共振成像伪影:镁与钛及碳纤维增强聚合物作为生物材料的体外评估
Neuroradiology. 2009 Aug;51(8):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0537-4. Epub 2009 May 26.
7
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with titanium implants of the thoracic and lumbar spine.胸椎和腰椎钛植入物的术后磁共振成像
Neurosurgery. 1996 Apr;38(4):741-5.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials.磁共振成像评估椎间测试间隔器:生物材料镁与钛和碳纤维增强聚合物的实验比较。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Mar;179(1):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0394-5. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
9
[Influence of sequence type on the extent of the susceptibility artifact in MRI--a shoulder specimen study after suture anchor repair].[序列类型对MRI中磁化率伪影程度的影响——缝合锚钉修复后的肩部标本研究]
Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813404.
10
[Rivet-like titanium clamps for refixation of bone covers after craniotomy--radiologic identification, safety and image quality in CT and MR studies].用于开颅术后骨瓣重新固定的铆钉样钛夹——CT和MR研究中的放射学识别、安全性及图像质量
Rofo. 1998 Dec;169(6):601-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015348.

引用本文的文献

1
Susceptibility artifacts induced by crowns of different materials with prepared teeth and titanium implants in magnetic resonance imaging.不同材料牙冠及备牙后牙和钛种植体在磁共振成像中产生的磁化率伪影。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03962-w.
2
Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.正畸矫治器相关伪影对 3-T MRI 电影的影响。
Prog Orthod. 2018 Feb 19;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0204-6.
3
[Effect of oral alloy post and core on magnetic resonance imaging].口腔合金桩核对磁共振成像的影响
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Dec;32(6):588-91. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2014.06.014.
4
Metal-induced artifacts in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of a biodegradable magnesium alloy versus titanium and stainless steel controls.计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像中的金属诱导伪影:可生物降解镁合金与钛及不锈钢对照物的比较。
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Jun;44(6):849-56. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-2057-5. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
5
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intervertebral test spacers: an experimental comparison of magnesium versus titanium and carbon fiber reinforced polymers as biomaterials.磁共振成像评估椎间测试间隔器:生物材料镁与钛和碳纤维增强聚合物的实验比较。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Mar;179(1):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s11845-009-0394-5. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
6
Artifacts in spine magnetic resonance imaging due to different intervertebral test spacers: an in vitro evaluation of magnesium versus titanium and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymers as biomaterials.不同椎间测试间隔器导致的脊柱磁共振成像伪影:镁与钛及碳纤维增强聚合物作为生物材料的体外评估
Neuroradiology. 2009 Aug;51(8):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0537-4. Epub 2009 May 26.
7
Implant detectibility of intervertebral disc spacers in post fusion MRI: evaluation of the MRI scan quality by using a scoring system--an in vitro study.融合术后MRI中椎间盘间隔器的植入物可检测性:使用评分系统评估MRI扫描质量——一项体外研究
Neuroradiology. 2007 Feb;49(2):103-9. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0161-5. Epub 2006 Nov 4.