Benichou Gilles, Kant Cavit D, Madsen Joren, Tocco Georges
Cellular and Molecular Immunology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Transplantation Unit, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachussets 02114, USA.
Front Biosci. 2007 May 1;12:4239-47. doi: 10.2741/2383.
The recognition by T cells of intact foreign MHC molecules at the surface of transplanted cells (direct pathway) was originally thought to represent the driving force behind acute rejection of allogeneic transplants. Over the past decade, however, a body of evidence has been provided demonstrating that T cell recognition of donor peptides presented by recipient APCs (indirect pathway) is sufficient on its own to ensure both acute and chronic rejection of allografts. While the direct allorecognition leads to an exceptionally vigorous inflammatory T cell response, it is thought to be short lived due to the rapid depletion of donor professional APCs and it can be controlled with a short course of immunosuppressive drugs including calcineurin inhibitors. In contrast, while the indirect alloresponse is oligoclonal and much weaker, it is long-lived and tends to spread to formerly cryptic determinants on donor and self-tissue specific antigens. This feature of indirect alloreactivity is presumably associated with the sustained presence of recipient professional APCs that can maintain a chronic inflammatory response similar to that observed in autoimmune diseases. Consequently, the indirect alloresponse may be more difficult to suppress than its direct counterpart. On the other hand, there is accumulating evidence showing that administration of alloantigen in a "tolerogenic fashion" mediates allograft acceptance via the activation of regulatory T cells recognizing donor antigens via the indirect allorecognition pathway. Apparently, these regulatory T cells can suppress both direct and indirect inflammatory T cell responses to donor antigens. This suggests that modulation of indirect alloreactivity may represent the best strategy to achieve long-term donor-specific tolerance to allotransplants.
T细胞对移植细胞表面完整的外来主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)分子的识别(直接途径)最初被认为是同种异体移植急性排斥反应背后的驱动力。然而,在过去十年中,已有大量证据表明,T细胞对受体抗原呈递细胞呈递的供体肽的识别(间接途径)本身就足以确保同种异体移植物的急性和慢性排斥反应。虽然直接同种异体识别会引发异常强烈的炎症性T细胞反应,但由于供体专职抗原呈递细胞的迅速耗竭,这种反应被认为是短暂的,并且可以通过短期使用包括钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂在内的免疫抑制药物来控制。相比之下,虽然间接同种异体反应是寡克隆性的且要弱得多,但它是长期存在的,并且倾向于扩散到供体和自身组织特异性抗原上以前隐蔽的决定簇。间接同种异体反应性的这一特征大概与受体专职抗原呈递细胞的持续存在有关,这些细胞可以维持类似于自身免疫性疾病中观察到的慢性炎症反应。因此,间接同种异体反应可能比直接同种异体反应更难抑制。另一方面,越来越多的证据表明,以“致耐受性方式”给予同种异体抗原可通过激活经由间接同种异体识别途径识别供体抗原的调节性T细胞来介导同种异体移植物的接受。显然,这些调节性T细胞可以抑制对供体抗原的直接和间接炎症性T细胞反应。这表明调节间接同种异体反应性可能是实现对同种异体移植长期供体特异性耐受的最佳策略。