Suppr超能文献

使用MP3播放器时,聆听环境和耳机类型对听力正常成年人偏好聆听水平的影响。

The effects of listening environment and earphone style on preferred listening levels of normal hearing adults using an MP3 player.

作者信息

Hodgetts William E, Rieger Jana M, Szarko Ryan A

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):290-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180479399.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to determine the influence of listening environment and earphone style on the preferred-listening levels (PLLs) measured in users' ear canals with a commercially-available MP3 player. It was hypothesized that listeners would prefer higher levels with earbud headphones as opposed to over-the-ear headphones, and that the effects would depend on the environment in which the user was listening. A secondary objective was to use the measured PLLs to determine the permissible listening duration to reach 100% daily noise dose.

DESIGN

There were two independent variables in this study. The first, headphone style, had three levels: earbud, over-the-ear, and over-the-ear with noise reduction (the same headphones with a noise reduction circuit). The second, environment, also had 3 levels: quiet, street noise and multi-talker babble. The dependent variable was ear canal A-weighted sound pressure level. A 3 x 3 within-subjects repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze the data. Thirty-eight normal hearing adults were recruited from the Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine at the University of Alberta. Each subject listened to the same song and adjusted the level until it "sounded best" to them in each of the 9 conditions.

RESULTS

Significant main effects were found for both the headphone style and environment factors. On average, listeners had higher preferred listening levels with the earbud headphones, than with the over-the-ear headphones. When the noise reduction circuit was used with the over-the-ear headphones, the average PLL was even lower. On average, listeners had higher PLLs in street noise than in multi-talker babble and both of these were higher than the PLL for the quiet condition. The interaction between headphone style and environment was also significant. Details of individual contrasts are explored. Overall, PLLs were quite conservative, which would theoretically allow for extended permissible listening durations. Finally, we investigated the maximum output level of the MP3 player in the ear canals of authors 1 and 3 of this paper. Levels were highest with the earbud style, followed by the over-the-ear with noise reduction. The over-the-ear headphone without noise reduction had the lowest maximum output.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of MP3 players are sold with the earbud style of headphones. Preferred listening levels are higher with this style of headphone compared to the over-the-ear style. Moreover, as the noise level in the environment increases, earbud users are even more susceptible to background noise and consequently increase the level of the music to overcome this. The result is an increased sound pressure level at the eardrum. However, the levels chosen by our subjects suggest that MP3 listening levels may not be as significant a concern as has been reported recently in the mainstream media.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定聆听环境和耳机类型对使用市售MP3播放器在用户耳道中测量的偏好聆听水平(PLL)的影响。研究假设,与头戴式耳机相比,听众使用耳塞式耳机时会偏好更高的音量,并且这种影响将取决于用户聆听的环境。次要目的是使用测量的PLL来确定达到100%每日噪声剂量的允许聆听持续时间。

设计

本研究有两个自变量。第一个是耳机类型,有三个水平:耳塞式、头戴式和带降噪功能的头戴式(同一副带有降噪电路的耳机)。第二个是环境,也有三个水平:安静、街道噪音和多人交谈的嘈杂声。因变量是耳道A加权声压级。采用3×3被试内重复测量方差分析来分析数据。从阿尔伯塔大学康复医学院招募了38名听力正常的成年人。每个受试者听同一首歌曲,并在9种条件下分别调整音量,直到对他们来说“听起来最好”。

结果

耳机类型和环境因素均有显著的主效应。平均而言,与头戴式耳机相比,听众使用耳塞式耳机时的偏好聆听水平更高。当头戴式耳机使用降噪电路时,平均PLL甚至更低。平均而言,听众在街道噪音环境中的PLL高于多人交谈的嘈杂声环境,且这两种环境下的PLL均高于安静环境下的PLL。耳机类型和环境之间的交互作用也很显著。对个体对比的细节进行了探讨。总体而言,PLL相当保守,从理论上讲这将允许延长允许的聆听持续时间。最后,我们研究了本文作者1和作者3耳道中MP3播放器的最大输出水平。耳塞式耳机的水平最高,其次是带降噪功能的头戴式耳机。不带降噪功能的头戴式耳机的最大输出最低。

结论

大多数MP3播放器配备的是耳塞式耳机。与头戴式耳机相比,这种类型的耳机偏好聆听水平更高。此外,随着环境噪音水平的增加,耳塞式耳机用户更容易受到背景噪音的影响,因此会提高音乐音量以克服这一问题。结果是鼓膜处的声压级增加。然而,我们受试者选择的音量水平表明,MP3的聆听音量可能不像主流媒体最近报道的那样令人担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验