Meyer Tim, Gässler Nina, Kindermann Wilfried
Institute of Sports Medicine, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany. tim.meyer@uni-paderborn..de
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007 Apr;32(2):249-56. doi: 10.1139/h06-108.
Several earlier studies were aimed at determining an exercise intensity that elicits maximal fat oxidation (Fatmax). However, these studies employed few different intensities or used exercise periods of too short a duration. All investigators described intensity with reference to maximal ergometric values, which might lead to metabolically inhomogeneous workloads between individuals. The aim of this study was to determine Fatmax by overcoming these methodological shortcomings of earlier investigations. Ten healthy recreational athletes (29 +/- 5 y; 75 +/- 6 kg; 1.81 +/- 0.04 m) conducted an initial incremental cycling test to determine VO2 peak (59.2 +/- 6.1 mL.min-1.kg-1) and individual anaerobic threshold (IAT; 221 +/- 476 W). Within 4 weeks, 5 constant-load tests of 1 h duration were carried out at 55%, 65%, 75%, 85%, and 95% IAT. During all tests indirect calorimetry (MetaMax I, Cortex, Leipzig, Germany) served to quantify fat oxidation. Capillary blood sampling for lactate measurements was conducted every 15 min. All subjects remained in a lactate steady state during the constant load tests, which minimized influences from excess CO2. There was no difference between the 5 intensities for the percentage of energy from fat metabolism (p = 0.12). Additionally, the intensities led to similar absolute amounts of oxidized fat (p = 0.34). However, there was a significant increase in fat metabolism with increasing exercise duration (p = 0.04). It is impossible to define one theoretical optimal intensity for fat oxidation that is true in all individuals. It is thus mandatory to perform an individual assessment with indirect calorimetry. Intra-individual day-to-day variation might render the use of several tests of long duration less applicable than incremental testing with stages of sufficient duration.
早期的几项研究旨在确定能引发最大脂肪氧化(Fatmax)的运动强度。然而,这些研究采用的强度种类较少,或者运动时长过短。所有研究者都参照最大测力计值来描述强度,这可能导致个体之间的代谢负荷不均匀。本研究的目的是通过克服早期研究的这些方法学缺陷来确定Fatmax。10名健康的业余运动员(29±5岁;75±6千克;身高1.81±0.04米)进行了一次初始递增式自行车测试,以确定最大摄氧量(59.2±6.1毫升·分钟⁻¹·千克⁻¹)和个体无氧阈(IAT;221±476瓦)。在4周内,以IAT的55%、65%、75%、85%和95%进行了5次时长为1小时的恒定负荷测试。在所有测试过程中,采用间接测热法(德国莱比锡Cortex公司的MetaMax I)来量化脂肪氧化。每15分钟采集一次毛细血管血样以测量乳酸。在恒定负荷测试期间,所有受试者均保持乳酸稳态,这将过量二氧化碳的影响降至最低。脂肪代谢供能百分比在这5种强度之间没有差异(p = 0.12)。此外,这些强度导致的氧化脂肪绝对量相似(p = 0.34)。然而,随着运动时长增加,脂肪代谢显著增加(p = 0.04)。不可能定义一个对所有个体都适用的理论最佳脂肪氧化强度。因此,必须采用间接测热法进行个体评估。个体的日常变化可能使多次长时间测试不如具有足够时长阶段的递增测试适用。