Higginbotham D Jeffery, Kim Kyung-Eun, Scally Christine
Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Augment Altern Commun. 2007 Jun;23(2):140-53. doi: 10.1080/07434610601045344.
The experiment compared the ability of a Comprehension Model versus an Interaction Model to account for the communication performance of augmented communicators. Five dyads consisting of adults without disabilities, with one participant in each dyad randomly assigned to use an augmentative communication device, engaged in ten direction-giving tasks in which the augmented communicator used either a Word Method (i.e., spoken words only) or a Mixed Method (i.e., mix of spoken words and letters) speech output. Results indicated an overall completion time and communication rate advantage for the Mixed Method output in most communication tasks, supporting the Interaction Model of augmented communication. The role of communication co-construction in augmented interaction and the implications of the Interaction Model for future communication device design are discussed.
该实验比较了理解模型与交互模型对辅助沟通者沟通表现的解释能力。五个由无残疾成年人组成的二人小组，每个小组中的一名参与者被随机分配使用辅助沟通设备，参与了十项指示任务，其中辅助沟通者使用单词法（即仅口语单词）或混合法（即口语单词和字母的混合）语音输出。结果表明，在大多数沟通任务中，混合法输出在总体完成时间和沟通速率方面具有优势，这支持了辅助沟通的交互模型。讨论了沟通共建在辅助交互中的作用以及交互模型对未来沟通设备设计的影响。
