López Patricia, Sanchez Cristina, Batlle Ramón, Nerín Cristina
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Aragón Institute of Engineering Research, i3A, CPS-University of Zaragoza, María de Luna Street 3, E-50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 May 30;55(11):4348-56. doi: 10.1021/jf063295u. Epub 2007 May 8.
The aim of the study presented here was to gain knowledge about the vapor-phase antimicrobial activity of selected essential oils and their major putatively active constituents against a range of foodborne bacterial and fungal strains. In a first step, the vapor-phase antimicrobial activities of three commercially available essential oils (EOs)-cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum), thyme (Thymus vulgaris), and oregano (Origanum vulgare)-were evaluated against a wide range of microorganisms, including Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Yersinia enterocolitica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella choleraesuis), Gram-positive bacteria (Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Enterococcus faecalis), molds (Penicillium islandicum and Aspergillus flavus), and a yeast (Candida albicans). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were generally lower for oregano EO than for the thyme and cinnamon EOs, especially against the relatively resistant Gram-negative. The persistence of the EOs' antimicrobial activities over time was assessed, and changes in the composition of the atmosphere they generated over time were determined using single-drop microextraction (SDME) in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and subsequent analysis of the data by principal component analysis (PCA). More relevant chemicals were selected. In addition, the vapor-phase activities of putatively key constituents of the oils were screened against representative Gram-positive (L. monocytogenes) and Gram-negative (S. choleraesuis) bacteria, a mold (A. flavus), and a yeast (C. albicans). Of the tested compounds, cinnamaldehyde, thymol, and carvacrol showed the strongest antimicrobial effectiveness, so their MICs, defined as the minimum vapor concentrations that completely inhibited detectable growth of the microorganisms, were calculated. To check for possible interactions between components present in the EOs, cinnamon EO was fortified with cinnamaldehyde and thyme EO with thymol, and then the antimicrobial activities of the fortified oils were compared to those of the respective unfortified EOs using fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indices and by plotting inhibition curves as functions of the vapor-phase concentrations. Synergistic effects were detected for cinnamaldehyde on A. flavus and for thymol on L. monocytogenes, S. choleraesuis, and A. flavus. In all other cases the fortification had additive effects, except for cinnamaldehyde's activity against S. choleraesuis, for which the effect was antagonistic. Finally, various microorganisms were found to cause slight changes over time to the atmospheres generated by all of the EOs (fortified and unfortified) except the fortified cinnamon EO.
本文所述研究的目的是了解所选精油及其主要假定活性成分对一系列食源细菌和真菌菌株的气相抗菌活性。第一步,评估了三种市售精油——肉桂(锡兰肉桂)、百里香(百里香)和牛至(牛至)——对多种微生物的气相抗菌活性,这些微生物包括革兰氏阴性菌(大肠杆菌、小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌、铜绿假单胞菌和猪霍乱沙门氏菌)、革兰氏阳性菌(单核细胞增生李斯特菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌和粪肠球菌)、霉菌(岛青霉和黄曲霉)以及一种酵母(白色念珠菌)。牛至精油的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)通常低于百里香和肉桂精油,尤其是对相对耐药的革兰氏阴性菌。评估了精油抗菌活性随时间的持续性,并使用单滴微萃取(SDME)结合气相色谱 - 质谱联用(GC - MS)以及随后通过主成分分析(PCA)对数据进行分析,确定了它们随时间产生的气氛组成变化。选择了更相关的化学物质。此外,针对代表性的革兰氏阳性菌(单核细胞增生李斯特菌)和革兰氏阴性菌(猪霍乱沙门氏菌)、一种霉菌(黄曲霉)以及一种酵母(白色念珠菌),筛选了精油假定关键成分的气相活性。在所测试的化合物中,肉桂醛、百里香酚和香芹酚显示出最强的抗菌效果,因此计算了它们的MIC,定义为完全抑制微生物可检测生长的最低气相浓度。为了检查精油中存在的成分之间可能的相互作用,用肉桂醛强化肉桂精油,用百里香酚强化百里香精油,然后使用分数抑菌浓度(FIC)指数并通过绘制抑制曲线作为气相浓度的函数,将强化精油的抗菌活性与各自未强化的精油进行比较。检测到肉桂醛对黄曲霉以及百里香酚对单核细胞增生李斯特菌、猪霍乱沙门氏菌和黄曲霉有协同作用。在所有其他情况下,强化具有相加作用,除了肉桂醛对猪霍乱沙门氏菌的活性,其作用是拮抗的。最后,发现除了强化的肉桂精油外,各种微生物会随着时间对所有精油(强化和未强化)产生的气氛造成轻微变化。