• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现在就取代药品专利。

Replace pharmaceutical patents now.

作者信息

Grinols Earl L, Henderson James W

机构信息

Department of Economics, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(5):355-63. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725050-00001.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-200725050-00001
PMID:17488135
Abstract

Pharmaceutical patents are anachronistic holdovers from an era in which modern economic understanding and tax tools were unavailable. Superior mechanisms lie somewhere between a first best pricing solution for the entire economy at one extreme and the current arrangements at the other. We discuss the economics of suggested alternatives and suggest that the intertemporal bounty is the best way to meet the multiple objectives of immediate distribution at marginal cost pricing of newly innovated patented drugs and easily administered, efficient inducement to continued innovation. The intertemporal bounty prevents the expansion of monopoly power resulting from co-pay or -insurance provisions common to modern prescription drug plans.

摘要

药品专利是一个时代遗留下来的不合时宜的产物,在那个时代,现代经济理解和税收工具尚未出现。最优机制处于一个极端的针对整个经济的最优定价解决方案与另一个极端的当前安排之间。我们讨论了建议替代方案的经济学原理,并认为跨期赏金是实现多个目标的最佳方式,这些目标包括以边际成本定价立即分销新创新的专利药品,以及以易于管理、高效的方式激励持续创新。跨期赏金可防止因现代处方药计划中常见的共付或保险条款而导致的垄断权力扩张。

相似文献

1
Replace pharmaceutical patents now.现在就取代药品专利。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(5):355-63. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725050-00001.
2
Should the patent system for new medicines be abolished?治疗新型药物的专利制度应该被废除吗?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):488-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100393.
3
Biotech patents-business as usual?生物技术专利——一切照旧?
Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;26(12):1326. doi: 10.1038/nbt1208-1326.
4
Patents: a threat to innovation?专利:对创新的威胁?
Science. 2010 Jan 1;327(5961):31-2; author reply 32. doi: 10.1126/science.327.5961.31.
5
Maximizing exclusivity for drug products.最大化药品的独家性。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005 Sep;4(9):709. doi: 10.1038/nrd1829.
6
Patent term extension: an expensive and unnecessary giveaway.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1982 Spring;1(2):25-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.1.2.25.
7
India remains on US trade "priority watch list" for failing to uphold international drug company patents.由于未能维护国际制药公司的专利,印度仍在美国贸易“优先观察名单”上。
BMJ. 2013 May 8;346:f2949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2949.
8
Intellectual property. Balancing innovation and access: patent challenges tip the scales.知识产权。平衡创新与获取:专利挑战使天平倾斜。
Science. 2009 Oct 16;326(5951):370-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1176116.
9
Toward allocative efficiency in the prescription drug industry.迈向处方药行业的配置效率。
Milbank Q. 1995;73(2):213-30.
10
Patent watch.专利观察
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Jan;12(1):14-5. doi: 10.1038/nrd3924.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantifying the Human Mortality Costs of Patent-based Intellectual Property: How Many Premature Deaths are due to Patents?量化基于专利的知识产权导致的人类死亡成本:专利造成了多少过早死亡?
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jun;33(2):109-120. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00516-3. Epub 2025 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs.创新的代价:药物研发成本的新估计
J Health Econ. 2003 Mar;22(2):151-85. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00126-1.
2
Returns on research and development for 1990s new drug introductions.20世纪90年代推出的新药的研发回报率。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20 Suppl 3:11-29. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220003-00002.
3
Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research.专利会阻碍创新吗?生物医学研究中的反公地悲剧。
Science. 1998 May 1;280(5364):698-701. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5364.698.
4
Toward allocative efficiency in the prescription drug industry.迈向处方药行业的配置效率。
Milbank Q. 1995;73(2):213-30.