Cappell Mitchell S
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun;102(6):1307-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01227.x. Epub 2007 May 3.
To comprehensively review all known reported cases of stomal metastases after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) to systematically identify risk factors for this complication and to develop strategies for reducing this risk.
Reported cases were identified by computerized literature searches. Criteria for risk factors for stomal metastases included: a substantially higher relative rate of this factor in patients with stomal metastases than expected from pharyngoesophageal malignancy in general, and biologic plausibility of this phenomenon.
Review of all 44 known stomal metastases revealed the following. The mean patient age was 59.0+/-10.0 (SD) yr, and 79% of patients were male. Pathologically proven stomal metastases were located in the abdominal wall (PEG exit site) in 63%, in the gastric wall (PEG entrance site) in 7%, and in both walls in 30%. Mean survival after diagnosis was only 4.3+/-3.8 months. Pathologic risk factors for stomal metastases included: (a) pharyngoesophageal location of primary cancer (in 100% of cases, 0% other locations); (b) squamous cell histology (in 98%, adenocarcinoma in 2%); (c) poorly or moderately differentiated histology (in 92%, well differentiated in 8%); (d) advanced pathologic stage (in 97%, early stage in 3%); and (e) large primary cancer size at diagnosis (mean diameter 4.2+/-2.3 cm). These risk factors appeared to be quantitatively large (e.g., 98% of cases had squamous histology vs 50% expected rate, odds ratio 40.1, OR CI 6.31-246.4, P<0.0001). Therapeutic risk factors for stomal metastases included: (a) endoscopic PEG placement (in 98%, surgical gastrostomy in 2%); (b) pull-string PEG technique (in 98%, push-guidewire in 2%, direct-introducer in 0%); (c) primary cancer untreated or known local recurrence after treatment before PEG (in 87%); and (d) time>or=3 months after PEG insertion (in 100%, <3 months in 0%; mean interval 7.8+/-5.2 months after PEG). Four of the currently reported risk factors are novel (pathologic factors d,e; therapeutic factors a,d).
Strong risk factors for stomal metastases include: pharyngoesophageal primary cancer, squamous cell histology, less well-differentiated cancer, large size, and advanced cancer stage. The risk may be reduced in patients with risk factors by radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or cancer surgery before PEG; by substituting the push-guidewire for the pull-string technique for PEG; and possibly by use of a sheath with the pull-string technique.
全面回顾经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)后所有已知的造口转移报道病例,系统识别该并发症的危险因素,并制定降低此风险的策略。
通过计算机文献检索确定报道病例。造口转移危险因素的标准包括:造口转移患者中该因素的相对发生率显著高于一般咽食管恶性肿瘤的预期发生率,且该现象具有生物学合理性。
对所有44例已知的造口转移病例进行回顾,结果如下。患者平均年龄为59.0±10.0(标准差)岁,79%为男性。病理证实的造口转移位于腹壁(PEG出口部位)的占63%,位于胃壁(PEG入口部位)的占7%,位于两壁的占30%。诊断后的平均生存期仅为4.3±3.8个月。造口转移的病理危险因素包括:(a)原发癌位于咽食管(100%的病例,其他部位为0%);(b)鳞状细胞组织学类型(98%,腺癌2%);(c)组织学分化差或中等分化(92%,高分化8%);(d)病理分期晚(97%,早期3%);(e)诊断时原发癌体积大(平均直径4.2±2.3 cm)。这些危险因素在数量上似乎差异很大(例如,98%的病例为鳞状组织学类型,预期发生率为50%,优势比40.1,OR可信区间6.31 - 246.4,P<0.0001)。造口转移的治疗危险因素包括:(a)内镜下PEG置入(98%,外科胃造口术2%);(b)拉绳式PEG技术(98%,推导线技术2%,直接导入器技术0%);(c)PEG前原发癌未治疗或治疗后已知局部复发(87%);(d)PEG插入后时间≥3个月(100%,<3个月0%;PEG后平均间隔7.8±5.2个月)。目前报道的危险因素中有四项是新发现的(病理因素d、e;治疗因素a、d)。
造口转移的强危险因素包括:咽食管原发癌、鳞状细胞组织学类型、分化程度较低的癌症、体积大及癌症分期晚。对于有危险因素的患者,可通过PEG前的放疗、化疗或癌症手术;用推导线技术替代拉绳式PEG技术;以及可能在拉绳式技术中使用鞘管来降低风险。