• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胆管刷检细胞学——使用液基薄层制片技术提高诊断敏感性:113例病例回顾

Bile duct brushings cytology--improving sensitivity of diagnosis using the ThinPrep technique: a review of 113 cases.

作者信息

Sheehan M M, Fraser A, Ravindran R, McAteer D

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Fosterhill, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2007 Aug;18(4):225-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00447.x. Epub 2007 May 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00447.x
PMID:17488259
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Common bile duct (CBD) brushings have been recognized as a technique of moderate sensitivity and high specificity in identifying carcinoma of the ampulla and pancreatico-biliary regions. This study evaluated the increase in sensitivity of this technique using the ThinPrep technique of specimen preparation when compared with conventional cytology smears.

METHODS

A total of 113 bile duct brushings were included in the study (38 conventional smears and 75 slides prepared using the ThinPrep technique). All slides were reviewed by one cytologist. Five categories of reporting were used: inadequate, negative, atypia, suspicious and malignant.

RESULTS

The inadequate category of reporting disappeared in the ThinPrep group with improved specimen fixation and preparation and hence reduced artefact. Sensitivity of diagnosis of malignancy increased from 39% in conventional smears to 53% in the ThinPrep group. Specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were 100%, 100%, 60% and 68% for conventional smears and were 100%, 100%, 60% and 72%, respectively, for ThinPrep specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

ThinPrep technique was associated with increased sensitivity of diagnosis, in part due to improved specimen fixation and reduced artefact. Cytology of bile duct brushings is an important diagnostic tool for sites from which it can be difficult to obtain a histology biopsy. It may therefore provide the only opportunity for tissue diagnosis of carcinoma from these sites, hence the importance of optimizing sensitivity.

摘要

目的

胆总管刷检已被公认为是一种在识别壶腹癌和胰胆管区域癌方面具有中等敏感性和高特异性的技术。本研究评估了与传统细胞学涂片相比,使用ThinPrep标本制备技术时该技术敏感性的提高情况。

方法

本研究共纳入113例胆管刷检样本(38例传统涂片和75例使用ThinPrep技术制备的玻片)。所有玻片均由一名细胞病理学家进行复查。采用五类报告方式:不满意、阴性、非典型、可疑和恶性。

结果

ThinPrep组中不满意报告类别消失,标本固定和制备得到改善,因此伪像减少。恶性肿瘤诊断的敏感性从传统涂片的39%提高到ThinPrep组的53%。传统涂片的特异性、阳性和阴性预测值及准确性分别为100%、100%、60%和68%,ThinPrep标本分别为100%、100%、60%和72%。

结论

ThinPrep技术与诊断敏感性的提高相关,部分原因是标本固定改善和伪像减少。胆管刷检细胞学是从难以获得组织学活检的部位进行诊断的重要工具。因此,它可能为这些部位的癌组织诊断提供唯一机会,所以优化敏感性很重要。

相似文献

1
Bile duct brushings cytology--improving sensitivity of diagnosis using the ThinPrep technique: a review of 113 cases.胆管刷检细胞学——使用液基薄层制片技术提高诊断敏感性:113例病例回顾
Cytopathology. 2007 Aug;18(4):225-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00447.x. Epub 2007 May 3.
2
Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations in pancreatic fine-needle aspiration biopsy.液基薄层制片法与传统制片法在胰腺细针穿刺活检中的比较。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2004 Feb;30(2):71-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.10349.
3
Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods.1000例胰腺和胆管刷检细胞学检查:结果回顾及制片方法比较
Cancer. 2006 Aug 25;108(4):231-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21842.
4
Triple-tissue sampling during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography increases the overall diagnostic sensitivity for cholangiocarcinoma.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中的三重组织采样可提高胆管癌的总体诊断敏感性。
Gut Liver. 2014 Nov;8(6):669-73. doi: 10.5009/gnl13292. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
5
Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.来自胆管系统的内镜刷检细胞学检查仍然很有价值。
Dan Med J. 2013 Jul;60(7):A4656.
6
Are a Double Duct Sign or Endoscopic Biopsies Reliable Predictors of Malignancy in Periampullary Lesions.双管征或内镜活检是否为壶腹周围病变恶性肿瘤的可靠预测指标?
Dig Surg. 2015;32(4):306-11. doi: 10.1159/000380959. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
ThinPrep processing of endoscopic brushing specimens.内镜刷检标本的ThinPrep处理
Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 Feb;105(2):163-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/105.2.163.
8
ERCP-directed brush cytology prepared by the Thinprep method: test performance and morphology of 149 cases.采用Thinprep方法制备的内镜逆行胰胆管造影引导下刷检细胞学检查:149例病例的检测性能和形态学
Cytopathology. 2004 Apr;15(2):80-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2004.00129.x.
9
Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in detecting carcinoma in bile duct brushings.ThinPrep涂片与传统涂片在胆管刷检中检测癌的比较。
Cancer. 2003 Aug 25;99(4):205-10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11481.
10
Cytologic brushings of ductal lesions during ERCP.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Mar-Apr;37(2):139-42. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70671-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of Malignancy for Indeterminate Cytology of Bile Duct Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.胆管狭窄细胞学检查结果不确定时的恶性肿瘤风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17292-y.
2
Diagnostic Criteria of Bile Cytology: A Multicenter Comparative Study of Conventional and Liquid-Based Cytology in Japan.胆汁细胞学诊断标准:日本传统细胞学与液基细胞学的多中心比较研究
Acta Cytol. 2025 Feb 28:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000544997.
3
Risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic biliary drainage.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影和内镜胆道引流术后胰腺炎的风险。
HPB (Oxford). 2009 May;11(3):222-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00020.x.