• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺部临床试验中面临的伦理问题。

Ethical issues confronted in pulmonary clinical trials.

作者信息

Wise Robert A

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 May;4(2):200-5; discussion 205. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-006GC.

DOI:10.1513/pats.200701-006GC
PMID:17494732
Abstract

Pulmonary clinical research possesses no unique ethical issues compared with other areas of medicine, but the range of disease states and conditions in pulmonary clinical research are broad. The ethical values guiding clinical research in pulmonary medicine are defined by the Belmont Report (i.e., patient autonomy, justice, and beneficence). This article uses some of the most well-known clinical trials in pulmonary medicine to illustrate these issues and the numerous perspectives that must be considered. Ethical issues covered include introduction of new surgical procedures, placebo controls and drug withdrawal designs, smoking status in trials of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the tensions between community practice, clinical care guidelines, and evidence-based medicine.

摘要

与医学的其他领域相比,肺部临床研究不存在独特的伦理问题,但肺部临床研究中的疾病状态和情况范围很广。指导肺部医学临床研究的伦理价值由《贝尔蒙报告》界定(即患者自主权、公正和 beneficence)。本文运用肺部医学中一些最著名的临床试验来说明这些问题以及必须考虑的众多观点。涵盖的伦理问题包括新手术程序的引入、安慰剂对照和撤药设计、慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者试验中的吸烟状况,以及社区实践、临床护理指南和循证医学之间的矛盾。

相似文献

1
Ethical issues confronted in pulmonary clinical trials.肺部临床试验中面临的伦理问题。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 May;4(2):200-5; discussion 205. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-006GC.
2
The case for evidence-based rulemaking in human subjects research.循证决策在人体研究中的应用。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Jun;10(6):3-13. doi: 10.1080/15265161003702857.
3
Professional ethics and professional etiquette in dentistry: are they compatible?牙科领域的职业道德与职业礼仪:它们相容吗?
J Hist Dent. 2007 Winter;55(3):119-25; discussion 171-85.
4
A brief review of the Belmont report.对《贝尔蒙报告》的简要回顾。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;29(4):173-4. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0b013e3181de9ec5.
5
With bated breath. Though Medicare will begin reimbursing for surgery to aid some emphysema patients, questions remain over benefit, cost.人们屏息以待。尽管医疗保险将开始为帮助一些肺气肿患者的手术提供报销,但在益处、成本方面仍存在疑问。
Mod Healthc. 2003 Oct 13;33(41):40-1.
6
State payer mandates to cover care in US oncology trials: do science and ethics matter?美国肿瘤临床试验中覆盖医疗服务的州支付者强制令:科学和伦理是否重要?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Mar 17;102(6):376-90. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq028. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
7
Module one: introduction to research ethics.模块一:研究伦理导论。
Dev World Bioeth. 2005 Mar;5(1):1-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2005.00099.x.
8
Is a placebo-controlled surgical trial an oxymoron?安慰剂对照的外科手术试验是一种矛盾修饰法吗?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):278-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.12.006.
9
New National Emphysema Treatment Trial paradigm of Health Care Financing Administration-sponsored clinical research trials: advances and dilemmas.医疗保健财务管理局资助的临床研究试验的新国家肺气肿治疗试验模式:进展与困境
J Investig Med. 2002 Mar;50(2):95-100.
10
Medicare says it will pay, but patients say 'no thanks'.医疗保险表示会支付费用,但患者却拒绝了。
N Y Times Web. 2006 Mar 3:C1, C4.

引用本文的文献

1
Celebration of the 50-Year Anniversary of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Division of Lung Diseases: A Half-Century of Landmark Clinical Trials.国立心肺血液研究所肺病科成立50周年庆典:半个世纪的里程碑式临床试验
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2019 Oct 23;6(4):359-70. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.6.4.2019.0157.
2
The paucity of ethical analysis in allergology.过敏学中伦理分析的匮乏。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb 7;9(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-5.
3
The role of NETT in emphysema research.NETT在肺气肿研究中的作用。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008 May 1;5(4):385-92. doi: 10.1513/pats.200709-153ET.
4
Usual care as the control group in clinical trials of nonpharmacologic interventions.在非药物干预临床试验中作为对照组的常规护理。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):577-82. doi: 10.1513/pats.200706-072JK.