Suppr超能文献

带内固定与不带内固定的多节段颈椎间盘切除术与椎体次全切除术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.

作者信息

Galler Robert M, Dogan Seref, Fifield Mary S, Bozkus Hakan, Chamberlain Robert H, Sonntag Volker K H, Crawford Neil R

机构信息

Spinal Biomechanics, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11):1220-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000270104.95045.24.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro flexibility test comparing biomechanics of cervical corpectomy versus discectomy with and without instrumentation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the additional effort required to perform multilevel discectomies instead of corpectomies is worthwhile biomechanically.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Both cervical corpectomy and discectomy have been shown to be effective clinically. No previous biomechanical comparison exists.

METHODS

Fourteen human cadaveric cervical spines were studied: 1) intact, 2) after discectomy and wedge grafting at C4-C5, C5-C6, and C6-C7 (Group 1) or corpectomy and strut grafting of C5 and C6 (Group 2), 3) after attaching a locking metal plate from C4-C7, and 4) after adding posterior locking lateral mass screw/rod instrumentation across C4-C7. Non-constraining, nondestructive torques induced flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation (maximum, 1.5 Nm) while angular motion was measured stereophotogrammetrically.

RESULTS

Discectomy and grafting did not alter the range of motion (ROM) significantly from normal during any loading mode (P > 0.11). Corpectomy and grafting allowed a significantly greater range of motion than normal during flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation (P < 0.05). Addition of an anterior plate reduced ROM to significantly less than normal during all loading modes in both groups (P < 0.005). Addition of posterior instrumentation further reduced ROM significantly in both groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in ROM between corpectomy and discectomy groups in any loading mode whether uninstrumented (P > 0.18), anteriorly plated (P > 0.33), or anteriorly and posteriorly instrumented (P > 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Less difference in stability was observed than was predicted between specimens receiving multilevel discectomy versus multilevel corpectomy, regardless of whether specimens were left unplated, plated anteriorly, or fixated with combined anterior/posterior instrumentation.

摘要

研究设计

体外灵活性测试,比较颈椎椎体次全切除术与椎间盘切除术在有无内固定情况下的生物力学。

目的

评估从生物力学角度来看,进行多级椎间盘切除术而非椎体次全切除术所需的额外努力是否值得。

背景数据总结

颈椎椎体次全切除术和椎间盘切除术在临床上均已被证明是有效的。此前尚无生物力学方面的比较。

方法

对14具人类尸体颈椎进行研究:1)完整状态;2)在C4 - C5、C5 - C6和C6 - C7行椎间盘切除及楔形植骨后(第1组)或在C5和C6行椎体次全切除及支撑植骨后(第2组);3)在C4 - C7安装锁定金属板后;4)在C4 - C7增加后路锁定侧块螺钉/棒内固定后。施加非约束性、非破坏性扭矩(最大1.5 Nm)诱导颈椎前屈、后伸、侧屈和轴向旋转,同时采用立体摄影测量法测量角度运动。

结果

在任何加载模式下,椎间盘切除及植骨后与正常相比,运动范围(ROM)均无显著改变(P > 0.11)。椎体次全切除及植骨后,在前屈、侧屈和轴向旋转时的运动范围显著大于正常(P < 0.05)。两组中,添加前路钢板后,在所有加载模式下ROM均显著小于正常(P < 0.005)。添加后路内固定后,两组的ROM进一步显著减小(P < 0.01)。在任何加载模式下,无论是未植入内固定(P > 0.18)、前路植入钢板(P > 0.33)还是前后路均植入内固定(P > 0.30),椎体次全切除组和椎间盘切除组之间的ROM均无显著差异。

结论

无论标本是未植入内固定、前路植入钢板还是采用前后路联合内固定,接受多级椎间盘切除术与多级椎体次全切除术的标本之间观察到的稳定性差异均小于预期。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验