Suppr超能文献

核人工耳蜗扩展输入动态范围的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants.

作者信息

Dawson P W, Vandali A E, Knight M R, Heasman J M

机构信息

Cooperative Research Centre for Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Innovation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2):163-76. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180312651.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether expanded instantaneous input dynamic ranges (IIDRs) in the Nucleus cochlear implant system benefit speech perception in the laboratory and listening in the real world.

DESIGN

Until recently, Nucleus cochlear implants have used an IIDR of approximately 30 dB. In this study, an IIDR of 31 dB was compared with 46 dB and 56 dB in the SPEAR3 research processor with nine adult implant recipients. Subjects were given two, 2-wk blocks of take-home experience with each of the three IIDRs. A single IIDR setting was used in each trial period. During the take-home experience with the expanded IIDRs, subjects used two programs: a standard program (with clinically measured electrode dynamic ranges) and a program with adjusted thresholds (decreased T levels). After each block of take-home experience, speech perception testing was conducted for CNC words in quiet (at 45 dB and 55 dB SPL) and for CUNY sentences in the presence of multi-taker babble.

RESULTS

On average, CNC word recognition at low presentation levels was significantly better with the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDRs, compared with the 31 dB IIDR; however, there was no significant difference between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR conditions. These benefits were greater for standard programs than for reduced T level programs. For CUNY sentences in babble, group results indicated no significant difference in performance across IIDR. The three IIDRs were rated similarly in real-life listening situations, and two of the subjects expressed tolerance problems with the expanded standard IIDRs.

CONCLUSIONS

IIDRs of 46 and 56 dB provided benefit in accessing low-level speech without a decrement in sentence perception in babble. Most subjects accepted the standard, wider IIDR programs in everyday life. No significant differences were found between the 46 dB and 56 dB IIDR programs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查核型人工耳蜗系统中扩展的瞬时输入动态范围(IIDR)是否有利于实验室中的言语感知以及现实世界中的聆听。

设计

直到最近,核型人工耳蜗一直使用约30 dB的IIDR。在本研究中,在SPEAR3研究型处理器中,将31 dB的IIDR与46 dB和56 dB的IIDR进行了比较,共有9名成年人工耳蜗植入者参与。受试者对三种IIDR中的每一种都进行了两个为期2周的居家体验阶段。每个试验阶段使用单一的IIDR设置。在使用扩展IIDR的居家体验期间,受试者使用两个程序:一个标准程序(具有临床测量的电极动态范围)和一个阈值调整程序(降低T水平)。在每个居家体验阶段之后,针对安静环境下的CNC单词(在45 dB和55 dB声压级)以及在多人交谈嘈杂环境中的纽约城市大学句子进行言语感知测试。

结果

平均而言,与31 dB的IIDR相比,46 dB和56 dB的IIDR在低呈现水平下的CNC单词识别明显更好;然而,46 dB和56 dB的IIDR条件之间没有显著差异。这些益处对于标准程序比降低T水平的程序更大。对于嘈杂环境中的纽约城市大学句子,组间结果表明不同IIDR之间的表现没有显著差异。在现实生活聆听情境中,三种IIDR的评分相似,并且有两名受试者表示对扩展的标准IIDR存在耐受问题。

结论

46 dB和56 dB的IIDR有利于获取低声级言语,且在嘈杂环境中的句子感知没有下降。大多数受试者在日常生活中接受了标准的、更宽IIDR的程序。46 dB和56 dB的IIDR程序之间未发现显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验