Wu Yibing, Bhattacharyya Debadeep, King Candice L, Baskerville-Abraham Irene, Huh Sung-Ho, Boysen Gunnar, Swenberg James A, Temple Brenda, Campbell Sharon L, Chaney Stephen G
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7260, USA.
Biochemistry. 2007 Jun 5;46(22):6477-87. doi: 10.1021/bi062291f. Epub 2007 May 12.
Proteins that discriminate between cisplatin-DNA adducts and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts are thought to be responsible for the differences in tumor range, toxicity, and mutagenicity of these two important chemotherapeutic agents. However, the structural basis for differential protein recognition of these adducts has not been determined and could be important for the design of more effective platinum anticancer agents. We have determined high-resolution NMR structures for cisplatin-GG and undamaged DNA dodecamers in the AGGC sequence context and have compared these structures with the oxaliplatin-GG structure in the same sequence context determined previously in our laboratory. This structural study allows the first direct comparison of cisplatin-GG DNA and oxaliplatin-GG DNA solution structures referenced to undamaged DNA in the same sequence context. Non-hydrogen atom rmsds of 0.81 and 1.21 were determined for the 15 lowest-energy structures for cisplatin-GG DNA and undamaged DNA, respectively, indicating good structural convergence. The theoretical NOESY spectra obtained by back-calculation from the final average structures showed excellent agreement with the experimental data, indicating that the final structures are consistent with the NMR data. Several significant conformational differences were observed between the cisplatin-GG adduct and the oxaliplatin-GG adduct, including buckle at the 5' G6.C19 base pair, opening at the 3' G7.C18 base pair, twist at the A5G6.T20C19 base pair step, slide, twist, and roll at the G6G7.C19C18 base pair step, slide at the G7C8.C18G17 base pair step, G6G7 dihedral angle, and overall bend angle. We hypothesize that these conformational differences may be related to the ability of various DNA repair proteins, DNA binding proteins, and DNA polymerases to discriminate between cisplatin-GG and oxaliplatin-GG adducts.
能够区分顺铂 - DNA加合物和奥沙利铂 - DNA加合物的蛋白质被认为是造成这两种重要化疗药物在肿瘤范围、毒性和致突变性方面存在差异的原因。然而,这些加合物的差异蛋白质识别的结构基础尚未确定,这可能对设计更有效的铂类抗癌药物很重要。我们已经确定了在AGGC序列背景下顺铂 - GG和未受损DNA十二聚体的高分辨率NMR结构,并将这些结构与我们实验室先前在相同序列背景下确定的奥沙利铂 - GG结构进行了比较。这项结构研究首次直接比较了在相同序列背景下以未受损DNA为参照的顺铂 - GG DNA和奥沙利铂 - GG DNA溶液结构。顺铂 - GG DNA和未受损DNA的15个最低能量结构的非氢原子均方根偏差分别为0.81和1.21,表明结构收敛良好。从最终平均结构反向计算得到的理论NOESY谱与实验数据显示出极好的一致性,表明最终结构与NMR数据一致。在顺铂 - GG加合物和奥沙利铂 - GG加合物之间观察到了几个显著的构象差异, 包括5' G6.C19碱基对处的弯曲、3' G7.C18碱基对处的开口、A5G6.T20C19碱基对步长处的扭曲、G6G7.C19C18碱基对步长处的滑动、扭曲和滚动、G7C8.C18G17碱基对步长处的滑动、G6G7二面角和整体弯曲角。我们推测这些构象差异可能与各种DNA修复蛋白、DNA结合蛋白和DNA聚合酶区分顺铂 - GG和奥沙利铂 - GG加合物的能力有关。