Brown Jason P, Krummen David E, Feld Gregory K, Narayan Sanjiv M
University of California and Veterans Administration Medical Centers, San Diego, California 92161, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 15;49(19):1965-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.080. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
This study was designed to separate focal from atypical macro-re-entrant atrial tachycardia (AT) on the electrocardiogram (ECG).
Focal AT often cannot be distinguished from macro-re-entrant AT until the time of electrophysiology study (EPS). We hypothesized that quantitative ECG metrics should separate focal AT, using its short activation relative to tachycardia cycle length (CL), from macro-re-entrant AT, whose activation should span the CL. We developed tools to accurately quantify CL and P- or F-wave duration even when overlying T waves, then prospectively applied them to patients during focal or macro-re-entrant AT ablation and compared them to the gold standard EPS diagnosis.
We studied 41 patients (27 men, 14 women) age 57 +/- 17 years. In the training group (n = 20), tachycardia P or F waves overlying T waves were identified from transitions in slope (dV/dt) relative to "expected" T waves generated from scaling of the sinus-rate T-wave. Electrocardiographic P-wave duration agreed with the duration of intra-atrial activation. Autocorrelation was used to estimate ECG atrial CL (p < 0.001).
Compared to macro-re-entry (n = 13), focal AT (n = 7) had shorter P waves (115 +/- 31 ms vs. 227 +/- 67 ms; p < 0.001) that were smaller ratios of CL (28 +/- 7% vs. 85 +/- 21%; p < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristic curve areas for AT were 0.92 for P(F)-wave duration and 0.99 for P(F)/CL ratio. On blinded prospective analysis (n = 21), P(F)-wave duration <160 ms identified focal (n = 7) from macro-re-entrant AT (n = 14) with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity, and a P(F)/CL ratio <45% gave 86% sensitivity and 98% specificity.
Quantitative ECG indexes of shorter atrial activation and longer diastolic interval separate focal from macro-re-entrant AT without diagnostic maneuvers.
本研究旨在通过心电图(ECG)区分局灶性与非典型大折返性房性心动过速(AT)。
在电生理检查(EPS)之前,局灶性AT通常无法与大折返性AT区分开来。我们假设,心电图定量指标应能将局灶性AT(其激动相对于心动过速周期长度(CL)较短)与大折返性AT(其激动应跨越整个CL)区分开来。我们开发了即使在T波重叠时也能准确量化CL以及P波或F波持续时间的工具,然后在局灶性或大折返性AT消融期间前瞻性地将其应用于患者,并将结果与金标准EPS诊断进行比较。
我们研究了41例患者(27例男性,14例女性),年龄57±17岁。在训练组(n = 20)中,相对于根据窦性心律T波缩放生成的“预期”T波,通过斜率变化(dV/dt)识别出重叠在T波上的心动过速P波或F波。心电图P波持续时间与心房内激动持续时间一致。使用自相关估计心电图心房CL(p < 0.001)。
与大折返性AT(n = 13)相比,局灶性AT(n = 7)的P波较短(115±31毫秒对227±67毫秒;p < 0.001),占CL的比例较小(28±7%对85±21%;p < 0.001)。AT的受试者操作特征曲线面积,P(F)波持续时间为0.92,P(F)/CL比值为0.99。在盲法前瞻性分析(n = 21)中,P(F)波持续时间<160毫秒可区分局灶性AT(n = 7)与大折返性AT(n = 14),敏感性为90%,特异性为90%,P(F)/CL比值<45%时,敏感性为86%,特异性为98%。
较短的心房激动和较长的舒张间期的心电图定量指标无需进行诊断操作就能区分局灶性与大折返性AT。