Trampuz Andrej, Murphy Christopher K, Rothstein David M, Widmer Andreas F, Landmann Regine, Zimmerli Werner
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jul;51(7):2540-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00120-07. Epub 2007 May 14.
We compared the efficacy of a novel rifamycin derivative, ABI-0043, with that of rifampin, alone and in combination with levofloxacin, against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 in a guinea pig tissue-cage infection model. The MIC, logarithmic-growth-phase minimal bactericidal concentration, and stationary-growth-phase minimal bactericidal concentration of ABI-0043 were 0.001, 0.008, and 0.25 microg/ml, respectively; the corresponding concentrations of rifampin were 0.016, 0.8, and 3.6 microg/ml, respectively. After a single intraperitoneal dose of 12.5 mg/kg of body weight, the peak concentration in cage fluid was 1.13 micarog/ml of ABI-0043 and 0.98 microg/ml of rifampin. Five days after completion of treatment, levofloxacin administered alone (5 mg/kg/12 h) resulted in bacterial counts in cage fluid that were similar to those for untreated controls (>8.0 log(10) CFU/ml), whereas rifampin and ABI-0043 administered alone (12.5 mg/kg/12 h) decreased the mean titers of bacteria +/- standard deviations to 1.43 +/- 0.28 log(10) and 1.57 +/- 0.53 log(10) CFU/ml, respectively, in cage fluid. In combination with levofloxacin, both rifamycins cleared bacteria from the cage fluid. The cure rates of cage-associated infections with rifampin and ABI-0043 administered alone were 46% and 58%, respectively, and increased to 88% and 92% in combination with levofloxacin. Emergence of rifamycin resistance was observed in 42% of cages after ABI-0043 therapy and in 38% of cages after rifampin therapy; no emergence of resistance occurred with combination treatment with levofloxacin. In conclusion, ABI-0043 had cure rates comparable to that of rifampin. ABI-0043 in combination with a quinolone has the potential for treatment of implant-associated infections caused by susceptible strains of S. aureus, potentially without drug-drug interactions.
在豚鼠组织笼感染模型中,我们比较了新型利福霉素衍生物ABI - 0043与利福平单独使用及与左氧氟沙星联合使用时,对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC 29213的疗效。ABI - 0043的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)、对数生长期最小杀菌浓度和稳定生长期最小杀菌浓度分别为0.001、0.008和0.25微克/毫升;利福平相应的浓度分别为0.016、0.8和3.6微克/毫升。单次腹腔注射12.5毫克/千克体重后,笼液中ABI - 0043的峰值浓度为1.13微克/毫升,利福平为0.98微克/毫升。治疗结束5天后,单独给予左氧氟沙星(5毫克/千克/12小时)导致笼液中的细菌计数与未治疗对照组相似(>8.0 log₁₀CFU/毫升),而单独给予利福平和ABI - 0043(12.5毫克/千克/12小时)使笼液中细菌的平均滴度±标准差分别降至1.43±0.28 log₁₀和1.57±0.53 log₁₀CFU/毫升。与左氧氟沙星联合使用时,两种利福霉素均可清除笼液中的细菌。单独使用利福平和ABI - 0043治疗笼相关感染的治愈率分别为46%和58%,与左氧氟沙星联合使用时分别提高到88%和92%。在ABI - 0043治疗后,42%的笼子中观察到利福霉素耐药性的出现,利福平治疗后为38%;左氧氟沙星联合治疗未出现耐药性。总之,ABI - 0043的治愈率与利福平相当。ABI - 0043与喹诺酮类药物联合使用有可能治疗由敏感金黄色葡萄球菌菌株引起的植入植入植入相关感染,且可能不存在药物相互作用。