Kerbrat P, Roché H, Bonneterre J, Veyret C, Lortholary A, Monnier A, Fumoleau P, Fargeot P, Namer M, Chollet P, Goudier M-J, Audhuy B, Simon H, Montcuquet P, Eymard J-C, Walter S, Clavère P, Guastalla J-P
Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Université de Rennes, Rue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, CS 44229, 35042 Rennes, France.
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 4;96(11):1633-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603773. Epub 2007 May 15.
The aim of the study was to compare our reference adjuvant chemotherapy, FEC100 (fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), epirubicin 100 mg m(-2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2), six cycles every 21 days), to an epirubicin-vinorelbine (Epi-Vnr) combination for early, poor-prognosis breast cancer patients. Patients (482) were randomised to receive FEC100, or Epi-Vnr (epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, six cycles every 21 days). The 7-year disease-free survival rates were 59.4 and 58.8%, respectively (P=0.47). The relative dose intensity of planned epirubicin doses was 89.1% with FEC100 and 88.9% with Epi-Vnr. There were significantly more grades 3-4 neutropenia (P=0.009) with Epi-Vnr, and significantly more nausea-vomiting (P<0.0001), stomatitis (P=0.0007) and alopecia (P<0.0001) with FEC100. No cases of congestive heart failure were reported, whereas four decreases in left ventricular ejection fraction occurred after FEC100 and five after Epi-Vnr. One case of acute myeloblastic leukaemia was registered in the FEC100 arm. After 7 years of follow-up, there was no difference between treatment arms. Epi-Vnr regimen provided a good efficacy in such poor-prognosis breast cancer patients, and could be an alternative to FEC100, taking into account respective safety profiles of both regimens.
本研究旨在比较我们的标准辅助化疗方案FEC100(氟尿嘧啶500 mg/m²、表柔比星100 mg/m²和环磷酰胺500 mg/m²,每21天进行6个周期)与表柔比星-长春瑞滨(Epi-Vnr)联合方案用于早期、预后不良的乳腺癌患者的疗效。482例患者被随机分为接受FEC100或Epi-Vnr(表柔比星50 mg/m²第1天,长春瑞滨25 mg/m²,第1天和第8天,每21天进行6个周期)治疗。7年无病生存率分别为59.4%和58.8%(P = 0.47)。计划的表柔比星剂量的相对剂量强度在FEC100组为89.1%,在Epi-Vnr组为88.9%。Epi-Vnr组3-4级中性粒细胞减少明显更多(P = 0.009),而FEC100组恶心呕吐(P < 0.0001)、口腔炎(P = 0.0007)和脱发(P < 0.0001)明显更多。未报告充血性心力衰竭病例,而FEC100组有4例左心室射血分数下降,Epi-Vnr组有5例。FEC100组登记了1例急性髓细胞白血病。经过7年的随访,各治疗组之间无差异。考虑到两种方案各自的安全性,Epi-Vnr方案在此类预后不良的乳腺癌患者中具有良好疗效,可作为FEC100的替代方案。