Morrison Vicki A, Wong Mitchell, Hershman Dawn, Campos Luis T, Ding Beiying, Malin Jennifer
Hematology/Oncology, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 May;13(4):337-48. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.4.337.
Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) significantly decrease the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), a common complication of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg), introduced in 2002, has a sustained duration of action, with a single dose comparable in efficacy to daily injections of filgrastim (5 g per kg per day) for 10 to 11 days; both agents should be initiated 24 hours after completing chemotherapy.
To (1) describe the use of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim in oncology practices throughout the United States and (2) compare their effectiveness in actual practice as measured by the outcome of febrile neutropenia in patients who received chemotherapy regimens administered every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian, colon cancer, or lymphoma and who received a CSF prior to developing FN.
Data were retrospectively obtained from the medical records of a cohort of adult patients aged 18 years or older treated in 99 community oncology practices in the United States in 2001 and 2003. Eligible patients were treated with chemotherapy every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian, colon cancer, or lymphoma and were users of filgrastim in 2001 (prior to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of pegfilgrastim in January 2002) or users of either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim or both CSF agents in 2003.
Pegfilgrastim was initiated, on average, 2.4 days (SD +/-3.2) after chemotherapy in the first cycle of use and 1.9 (+/-3.0) days in subsequent cycles of use. In contrast, filgrastim was started on average 7.7 (+/-6.5) days and 4.9 (4.6) days after chemotherapy in the first and subsequent cycles of use in 2001, increasing to 9.6 (+/-6.2) and 6.4 (+/-6.4) days in 2003. In the first cycle of CSF use, filgrastim was administered for an average of 5.2 (+/-3.5) days to 583 patients in 2001 and 3.7 (+/-2.8) days to 868 patients in 2003 (P <0.001). Among patients who received more than 1 cycle of filgrastim (n = 457 in 2001 and n = 489 in 2003; 78.4% and 56.3% of filgrastim users, respectively), the mean days of filgrastim administered in subsequent cycles was 6.0 (+/-3.5) in 2001 and 4.6 (+/-3.2) in 2003. Pegfilgrastim was administered as a single dose per chemotherapy course to 1,412 patients in 2003. Patients who received pegfilgrastim were more likely to have at least 1 myelosuppressive drug (74.8%) in the regimen compared with patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (70.0%, P = 0.013), but a greater proportion of filgrastim patients in 2003 (19.4%) had advanced-stage disease compared with pegfilgrastim patients (14.8%, P = 0.005). More patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (36.2%) had a cancer other than breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma compared with those who received pegfilgrastim (29.5%, P = 0.001). A total of 94 of 1,451 patients (6.5%) who received filgrastim experienced FN compared with 67 of 1,412 patients (4.7%) for pegfilgrastim. The odds ratio of developing FN among patients who received filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim was 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.96; P = 0.040) after adjusting for patient and chemotherapy regimen characteristics.
In this retrospective study of patients treated in 99 community oncology practices, patients who received filgrastim often initiated treatment later than recommended and received fewer days per cycle than demonstrated to be effective in randomized controlled trials. Pegfilgrastim was generally initiated earlier within the course of chemotherapy compared with filgrastim, and because of its sustained duration of action, only a single injection was required. In these patients treated with a heterogeneous group of chemotherapy regimens with a broad range of risk of FN, overall, an absolute 1.8% increase in the incidence of developing FN was observed in patients who received filgrastim compared with patients who received pegfilgrastim, (absolute rates of 6.5% and 4.7%, respectively).
集落刺激因子(CSF)可显著降低发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的风险,FN是骨髓抑制性化疗的常见并发症。培非格司亭(6毫克)于2002年推出,作用持续时间长,单剂量疗效与每日注射非格司亭(5微克/千克/天)10至11天相当;两种药物均应在化疗结束后24小时开始使用。
(1)描述培非格司亭和非格司亭在美国各地肿瘤治疗中的使用情况;(2)比较它们在实际应用中的有效性,以接受每3至4周进行一次乳腺癌、肺癌、卵巢癌、结肠癌或淋巴瘤化疗方案且在发生FN之前接受CSF治疗的患者发生发热性中性粒细胞减少症的结果来衡量。
回顾性收集2001年和2003年在美国99家社区肿瘤诊所接受治疗的18岁及以上成年患者队列的病历数据。符合条件的患者每3至4周接受一次乳腺癌、肺癌、卵巢癌、结肠癌或淋巴瘤化疗,2001年(美国食品药品监督管理局于2002年1月批准培非格司亭之前)使用非格司亭,或2003年使用非格司亭、培非格司亭或两种CSF药物。
在首次使用周期中,培非格司亭平均在化疗后2.4天(标准差±3.2)开始使用,在后续使用周期中为1.9天(±3.0)。相比之下,2001年首次和后续使用周期中,非格司亭平均在化疗后7.7天(±6.5)和4.9天(4.6)开始使用,2003年增加到9.6天(±6.2)和6.4天(±6.4)。在首次使用CSF周期中,2001年583例患者使用非格司亭平均给药5.2天(±3.5),2003年868例患者使用非格司亭平均给药3.7天(±2.8)(P<0.001)。在接受超过1个周期非格司亭治疗的患者中(2001年n = 457,2003年n = 489;分别占非格司亭使用者的78.4%和56.3%),2001年后续周期中使用非格司亭的平均天数为6.0天(±3.5),2003年为4.6天(±3.2)。2003年,1412例患者每个化疗疗程接受一次培非格司亭给药。与2003年接受非格司亭治疗的患者相比,接受培非格司亭治疗的患者在治疗方案中更有可能至少使用1种骨髓抑制药物(74.8%)(70.0%,P = 0.013),但2003年接受非格司亭治疗的患者中晚期疾病的比例更高(19.4%),高于接受培非格司亭治疗的患者(14.8%,P = 0.005)。2003年接受非格司亭治疗的患者中,患乳腺癌或非霍奇金淋巴瘤以外癌症的比例更高(36.2%),高于接受培非格司亭治疗的患者(29.5%,P = 0.001)。1451例接受非格司亭治疗的患者中有94例(6.5%)发生FN,而1412例接受培非格司亭治疗的患者中有67例(4.7%)发生FN。在调整患者和化疗方案特征后,接受非格司亭治疗的患者发生FN的比值比为1.41(95%置信区间,1.02 - 1.96;P = 0.040)。
在这项对99家社区肿瘤诊所治疗患者的回顾性研究中,接受非格司亭治疗的患者开始治疗的时间通常比推荐时间晚,且每个周期接受治疗的天数比随机对照试验中证明有效的天数少。与非格司亭相比,培非格司亭通常在化疗过程中更早开始使用,并且由于其作用持续时间长,仅需单次注射。在这些接受多种化疗方案且FN风险范围广泛的患者中,总体而言,接受非格司亭治疗的患者发生FN的发生率比接受培非格司亭治疗的患者绝对增加了1.8%(绝对发生率分别为6.5%和4.7%)。