Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle, Medical Oncology, Liège, Belgium.
Nemocnice Hořovice Hospital, Hořovice, Czech Republic.
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Apr;27(4):1449-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4473-x. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
Prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia (FN) is recommended for the duration of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in high-risk patients; yet, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) discontinuation occurs frequently in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of FN in real-world settings and the extent and impact of early pegfilgrastim discontinuation.
This prospective, observational study enrolled patients with any-stage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or breast cancer initiating a new chemotherapy course with a high (> 20%) FN risk, with pegfilgrastim in cycle 1. During routine clinical visits, data were collected on FN events, discontinuation of pegfilgrastim (defined as administration of G-CSF other than pegfilgrastim for ≥ 1 cycle) and all G-CSF (and reasons), neutropenic complications and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
Overall, 943 patients were enrolled; 844 met the eligibility criteria (full analysis set) and 814 (86%) completed the study. Twenty-eight patients (3%) had 31 FN events (NHL, n = 17; breast cancer, n = 11). Twenty-six patients (3%) discontinued pegfilgrastim. Forty-four patients (5%) discontinued G-CSF. The most common reason for pegfilgrastim discontinuation was physician preference for daily G-CSF (n = 14 [2%]), and for discontinuation of all G-CSFs was reduced FN risk (n = 14 [2%]). Patients who continued G-CSF prophylaxis were less likely to experience neutropenic complications (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.26 [0.09-0.80]). Suspected ADRs to pegfilgrastim occurred in 43 patients (5%) and serious ADRs in 5 (1%).
FN rates were consistent with previous reports with pegfilgrastim in clinical practice. No new ADRs were observed. G-CSF discontinuation was uncommon but appeared to increase the likelihood of neutropenic complications.
在高危患者接受骨髓抑制性化疗期间,推荐使用预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的药物;然而,粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在临床实践中经常被停用。本研究的目的是调查真实环境下 FN 的发生率,以及早期停用培非格司亭的程度和影响。
这项前瞻性、观察性研究纳入了开始新化疗周期的任何分期非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)或乳腺癌患者,这些患者的 FN 风险较高(>20%),且在第 1 周期中使用培非格司亭。在常规临床访视期间,收集 FN 事件、培非格司亭停药(定义为 G-CSF 替代培非格司亭治疗≥1个周期)以及所有 G-CSF(和原因)、中性粒细胞减少性并发症和药物不良反应(ADR)的数据。
共有 943 例患者入组;844 例符合入选标准(全分析集),814 例(86%)完成了研究。28 例(3%)患者发生 31 例 FN 事件(NHL,n=17;乳腺癌,n=11)。26 例(3%)患者停用了培非格司亭。44 例(5%)患者停用了 G-CSF。培非格司亭停药的最常见原因是医生偏爱每日 G-CSF(n=14[2%]),而所有 G-CSF 停药的原因是 FN 风险降低(n=14[2%])。继续 G-CSF 预防治疗的患者发生中性粒细胞减少性并发症的可能性较小(优势比[95%置信区间]:0.26[0.09-0.80])。43 例(5%)患者发生培非格司亭疑似不良反应,5 例(1%)患者发生严重不良反应。
FN 发生率与临床实践中使用培非格司亭的既往报告一致。未观察到新的 ADR。G-CSF 停药并不常见,但似乎增加了中性粒细胞减少性并发症的发生风险。