Fuzikawa Cíntia, Lima-Costa Maria Fernanda, Uchôa Elizabeth, Shulman Kenneth
Public Health and Ageing Research Group (PHARG), Federal University of Minas Gerais Medical School and Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, René Rachou Research Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2007 Aug;19(4):657-67. doi: 10.1017/S1041610207005467. Epub 2007 May 17.
The aim of the study was to determine the correlation and agreement between the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clock Drawing Test (CDT), administered and scored using Shulman's method (2000), in elderly Brazilian adults with very low levels of formal education.
CDT and MMSE tests, performed by a sample of 1118 elderly subjects from a population-based cohort, were evaluated. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated for the total sample and according to gender, age and schooling level. Agreement was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
CDTs with high scores had high corresponding MMSE scores whereas CDTs with low scores had a wide range of corresponding MMSE scores. Correlation was moderate (rho=0.64) and no difference was found according to gender, age or schooling level. For CDT cut-off 3/4, the best MMSE cut-off was 27/28 and agreement between tests was 75.1%.
Correlation between tests was moderate. Subjects who performed well on the CDT could be expected to obtain high MMSE scores. Although one test does not substitute for the other, the CDT may be more practical in developing countries where resources are limited and low education is common in the elderly, as well as in situations where time for assessment or screening is limited. Moreover, the CDT may be sensitive to cognitive domains not assessed by the MMSE.
本研究旨在确定使用舒尔曼方法(2000年)进行施测和评分的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)与画钟试验(CDT)在受教育程度极低的巴西老年成年人中的相关性和一致性。
对来自一个基于人群队列的1118名老年受试者样本进行的CDT和MMSE测试进行了评估。计算了总样本以及按性别、年龄和受教育程度划分的斯皮尔曼相关系数。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估一致性。
CDT得分高的受试者MMSE得分相应也高,而CDT得分低的受试者对应的MMSE得分范围较宽。相关性为中等(rho = 0.64),未发现按性别、年龄或受教育程度有差异。对于CDT临界值3/4,最佳MMSE临界值为27/28,测试之间的一致性为75.1%。
测试之间的相关性为中等。预计在CDT中表现良好的受试者MMSE得分较高。虽然一项测试不能替代另一项测试,但在资源有限且老年人受教育程度低的发展中国家,以及评估或筛查时间有限的情况下,CDT可能更实用。此外,CDT可能对MMSE未评估的认知领域敏感。