Williams Teresa C, DeMartini Wendy B, Partridge Savannah C, Peacock Sue, Lehman Constance D
Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, Room G3-200, Seattle, WA 98109-1023, USA.
Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):94-103. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2441060634. Epub 2007 May 16.
To retrospectively determine the sensitivity of kinetic features measured with computer-aided evaluation at breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in discriminating benign from malignant lesions, with histopathologic findings used as the reference standard.
Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Informed consent was waived. Suspicious breast lesions visible only at MR imaging and in which biopsy had been performed with MR imaging guidance were retrospectively evaluated with a computer-aided evaluation program. Computer-generated kinetic features for each lesion were recorded, and those of benign and malignant lesions were compared. Features analyzed included the presence or absence of computer-aided evaluation "threshold enhancement" at 50% and 100% minimum thresholds; degree of initial peak enhancement; and enhancement profiles composed of lesion percentages of washout, plateau, and persistent enhancement. The Fisher exact test and Student t test were used to assess differences in these analyses.
One hundred fifty-four consecutive lesions (41 malignant, 113 benign) in 125 women (age range, 27-86 years; mean age, 52 years) were evaluated. The presence of threshold enhancement at computer-aided evaluation was sensitive for malignancy, with 38 of 41 (93%) malignant lesions demonstrating enhancement at both the 50% and 100% thresholds. Absence of threshold enhancement at computer-aided evaluation helped improve the discrimination between benign and malignant lesions when compared with that at initial interpretation by the radiologists. False-positive rates were reduced by 8.8% at the 50% enhancement threshold (not significant) and by 23.0% at the 100% enhancement threshold (P=.02) when compared with that at initial interpretation. Analyses of initial peak enhancement values and enhancement profiles did not demonstrate further improvements in lesion discrimination.
The use of computer-aided evaluation for breast MR imaging significantly helped improve the discrimination of benign from malignant lesions when compared with that at initial interpretations by radiologists.
回顾性确定在乳腺磁共振(MR)成像中通过计算机辅助评估测量的动力学特征在鉴别良性与恶性病变方面的敏感性,以组织病理学结果作为参考标准。
本符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。豁免了知情同意书。仅在MR成像中可见且已在MR成像引导下进行活检的可疑乳腺病变通过计算机辅助评估程序进行回顾性评估。记录每个病变的计算机生成动力学特征,并比较良性和恶性病变的特征。分析的特征包括在50%和100%最小阈值时计算机辅助评估“阈值增强”的有无;初始峰值增强程度;以及由洗脱、平台期和持续增强的病变百分比组成的增强曲线。使用Fisher精确检验和Student t检验评估这些分析中的差异。
对125名女性(年龄范围27 - 86岁;平均年龄52岁)的154个连续病变(41个恶性,113个良性)进行了评估。计算机辅助评估时阈值增强的存在对恶性肿瘤敏感,41个恶性病变中有38个(93%)在50%和100%阈值时均显示增强。与放射科医生的初始解读相比,计算机辅助评估时无阈值增强有助于提高良性与恶性病变之间的鉴别。与初始解读相比,在50%增强阈值时假阳性率降低了8.8%(无统计学意义),在100%增强阈值时降低了23.0%(P = 0.02)。对初始峰值增强值和增强曲线的分析未显示病变鉴别有进一步改善。
与放射科医生的初始解读相比,乳腺MR成像使用计算机辅助评估显著有助于提高良性与恶性病变的鉴别。