Tsai Feng-Chun, Wang Yao-Chang, Huang Yao-Kuang, Tseng Chi-Nan, Wu Meng-Yu, Chang Yu-Sheng, Chu Jaw-Ji, Lin Pyng Jing
Section of Cardiac Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jul;35(7):1673-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000269030.57298.AF.
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has been applied successfully to patients with cardiopulmonary failure in extreme situations. Refractory ventricular tachycardia has high mortality and morbidity rates if not terminated in time. This study describes our preliminary experiences in using ECLS to treat patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia.
Retrospective chart review.
Hospital.
Eleven patients suffering from ventricular tachycardia refractory to antiarrhythmia agents and cardioversion attempts.
From January 2002 to December 2004, 11 patients suffering from ventricular tachycardia refractory to antiarrhythmia agents and cardioversion attempts were treated with ECLS. Mean patient age was 31 +/- 21 yrs (range, 3-69 yrs). The triggering events were acute myocarditis (n = 8), coronary artery spasm (n = 1), and hypoxemia secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 2). Nine (82%) patients received venoarterial mode support and the remaining two (18%) were supported with venovenous mode to correct hypoxemia. Pump flow was first maximized (mean, 3800 +/- 1100 mL/min) to unload the heart, and an intra-aortic balloon pump was used to deal with the increased afterload (n = 8).
Mean ventricular tachycardia duration before ECLS was 50 +/- 16 mins (range, 20-75 mins) and soon converted to a sinus rhythm following ECLS deployment, including four patients who experienced spontaneous recovery without attempted cardioversion, in a mean of 7.4 mins (range, 1-20 mins). Four patients required temporary pacing but none needed a permanent pacemaker after recovery. Mean duration of ECLS support was 119 +/- 69 hrs (range, 12-250 hrs). We excluded one patient who had permanent brain injury and another who succumbed to multiple organ failure. Nine (82%) patients were weaned and discharged with normal cardiac function. No recurrent ventricular tachycardia attack but one recurrent cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction = 15%) was reported during a mean 42-month follow-up.
Using ECLS to terminate refractory ventricular tachycardia proved effective for selected patients when conventional therapeutic options were exhausted. Early deployment of ECLS to prevent secondary organ injury, maintain sufficient cardiac unloading, and avoid complications during ECLS support was central to successful outcomes.
体外生命支持(ECLS)已成功应用于极端情况下的心肺功能衰竭患者。难治性室性心动过速若不及时终止,死亡率和发病率都很高。本研究描述了我们使用ECLS治疗难治性室性心动过速患者的初步经验。
回顾性病历审查。
医院。
11例对抗心律失常药物和复律治疗无效的室性心动过速患者。
2002年1月至2004年12月,11例对抗心律失常药物和复律治疗无效的室性心动过速患者接受了ECLS治疗。患者平均年龄为31±21岁(范围3 - 69岁)。触发事件为急性心肌炎(8例)、冠状动脉痉挛(1例)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征继发的低氧血症(2例)。9例(82%)患者接受静脉 - 动脉模式支持,其余2例(18%)接受静脉 - 静脉模式支持以纠正低氧血症。首先将泵流量最大化(平均3800±1100 mL/分钟)以使心脏减负,并使用主动脉内球囊反搏处理增加的后负荷(8例)。
ECLS前室性心动过速平均持续时间为50±16分钟(范围20 - 75分钟),在应用ECLS后很快转为窦性心律,其中4例患者未经复律尝试即自行恢复,平均恢复时间为7.4分钟(范围1 - 20分钟)。4例患者需要临时起搏,但恢复后均无需永久起搏器。ECLS支持的平均持续时间为119±69小时(范围12 - 250小时)。我们排除了1例有永久性脑损伤的患者和另1例死于多器官功能衰竭的患者。9例(82%)患者撤机并心功能正常出院。在平均42个月的随访期间,未报告室性心动过速复发,但有1例复发性心肌病(射血分数 = 15%)。
当传统治疗方法无效时,使用ECLS终止难治性室性心动过速对部分患者有效。早期应用ECLS以预防继发性器官损伤、维持足够的心脏减负并避免ECLS支持期间的并发症是成功治疗的关键。