Suppr超能文献

一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。

Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.

作者信息

Warren Paul, Thompson Maureen, Cugini MaryAnn

机构信息

Procter & Gamble Health Care Research Center Mason, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the plaque removing efficacy and safety of a novel manual toothbrush (Oral-B Pulsar-PUL) compared to leading manual and battery toothbrushes.

METHODOLOGY

Three clinical studies were conducted, each having a randomized, examiner-blind, crossover design. Study 1 compared PUL to a newly marketed manual toothbrush, Colgate 360 degrees (COL), Study 2 compared PUL to the Oral-B Advantage Plus (AP) and Oral-B CrossAction (CA) manual toothbrushes, and Study 3 compared PUL to two battery toothbrushes, Oral-B CrossAction Power (CAP) and Crest SpinBrush Pro (SBP). Before each brushing visit, subjects refrained from all oral hygiene procedures for 23-25 hours, received an oral tissue examination, and pre-brushing plaque was scored based on the Rustogi et. al, odified Navy Plaque Index. After subjects brushed with the assigned toothbrush in their usual manner for one minute, oral tissues were then re-examined and post-brushing plaque scores recorded. Subjects with pre-brushing whole mouth mean plaque scores > or = 0.6 continued in the study after the first visit. Following a brief washout period between additional visits, the above procedures were repeated in the remaining treatment periods. The examiners who made all clinical measurements were blinded to the treatment sequence.

RESULTS

All toothbrushes significantly (p = 0.0001) reduced plaque levels from all areas after a single brushing. Study 1 showed a significant difference for PUL in all areas, whole mouth, margin, and approximal (p < 0.05) compared to COL. In Study 2, PUL removed significantly more whole mouth (p < 0.01) and approximal plaque (p < 0.005) than AP as scored by two examiners, but did not show a significant advantage versus CA. In Study 3, PUL removed significantly more plaque than CAP and SBP for whole mouth (both p = 0.0001), marginal (both p = 0.0001), and approximal (p < 0.005, p = 0.0001, respectively) areas. All toothbrushes were found to be safe with no evidence of hard or soft tissue trauma.

CONCLUSION

The new Oral-B Pulsar toothbrush removed significantly more plaque than Colgate 360 and Oral-B Advantage Plus. Additionally, Pulsar removed significantly more plaque than two battery brushes, Oral-B CrossAction Power and Crest SpinBrush Pro.

摘要

目的

评估一款新型手动牙刷(欧乐-B脉冲星 - PUL)与领先的手动和电动牙刷相比的去牙菌斑功效及安全性。

方法

进行了三项临床研究,每项研究均采用随机、检查者盲法、交叉设计。研究1将PUL与一款新上市的手动牙刷高露洁360度(COL)进行比较;研究2将PUL与欧乐-B优势倍加(AP)和欧乐-B交叉动作(CA)手动牙刷进行比较;研究3将PUL与两款电动牙刷欧乐-B交叉动作动力(CAP)和佳洁士旋转刷头专业版(SBP)进行比较。在每次刷牙前,受试者需停止所有口腔卫生程序23 - 25小时,接受口腔组织检查,并根据Rustogi等人改良的海军牙菌斑指数对刷牙前的牙菌斑进行评分。受试者用指定牙刷按其习惯方式刷牙一分钟后,再次检查口腔组织并记录刷牙后的牙菌斑评分。刷牙前全口平均牙菌斑评分≥0.6的受试者在首次就诊后继续参与研究。在后续就诊之间有一段短暂的洗脱期,之后在剩余治疗阶段重复上述程序。进行所有临床测量的检查者对治疗顺序不知情。

结果

所有牙刷在单次刷牙后均显著(p = 0.0001)降低了所有区域的牙菌斑水平。研究1显示,与COL相比,PUL在所有区域、全口、边缘和邻面均有显著差异(p < 0.05)。在研究2中,由两位检查者评分,PUL去除的全口牙菌斑(p < 0.01)和邻面牙菌斑(p < 0.005)均显著多于AP,但与CA相比未显示出显著优势。在研究3中,PUL在全口(p = 0.0001)、边缘(p = 0.0001)和邻面(分别为p < 0.005,p = 0.0001)区域去除的牙菌斑显著多于CAP和SBP。所有牙刷均被发现是安全的,没有硬组织或软组织损伤的证据。

结论

新型欧乐-B脉冲星牙刷去除的牙菌斑显著多于高露洁360和欧乐-B优势倍加。此外,脉冲星去除的牙菌斑显著多于两款电动牙刷,即欧乐-B交叉动作动力和佳洁士旋转刷头专业版。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验