Oral Pathology Department, Member of Kerman Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Kerman, Iran.
Int Dent J. 2011 Jun;61(3):131-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00029.x.
This study aimed to compare an electric toothbrush with two manual toothbrushes, in their relative efficacy to control plaque.
Randomised clinical trial.
Kerman Dental School, Iran.
Forty-five volunteer dental students were randomly assigned to one of three groups. All subjects received a baseline plaque assessment using O'Leary plaque index, and then a prophylaxis to achieve the plaque index of zero. Subjects were trained to brush twice daily, with their assigned device and return after 1week and then after 2weeks for plaque assessment. Chi-squared and ANOVA were mainly used.
Plaque assessment using O'Leary plaque index.
Although Jordan toothbrush consistently resulted in lower plaque indices compared to both manual toothbrushes, those differences were not statistically significant, F(2, 42)=2.45, P=0.10. Plaque reduction from week 1 to week 2 was significant in Jordan Power group (60%, from 13.46 to 5.44, P=0.010) and Panbehriz Classic group (53%, from 20.92 to 9.91, P=0.007).
The results of this study shows no evidence of statistically significant difference in respect to plaque control, between Jordan Power electric toothbrush and either of Oral-B Advantage or Panbehriz Classic manual brushes in a group of dental students after 2weeks.
本研究旨在比较电动牙刷与两种手动牙刷在控制菌斑方面的相对效果。
随机临床试验。
伊朗克尔曼牙科学院。
45 名志愿牙科学生被随机分配到三组中的一组。所有受试者均使用 O'Leary 菌斑指数进行基线菌斑评估,然后进行预防措施使菌斑指数降为零。对受试者进行了两次每天使用指定器械刷牙的培训,1 周后和 2 周后返回进行菌斑评估。主要使用卡方检验和方差分析。
使用 O'Leary 菌斑指数进行菌斑评估。
虽然 Jordan 牙刷与两种手动牙刷相比,其菌斑指数始终较低,但差异无统计学意义,F(2,42)=2.45,P=0.10。Jordan Power 组(从 13.46 降至 5.44,P=0.010)和 Panbehriz Classic 组(从 20.92 降至 9.91,P=0.007)在第 1 周至第 2 周的菌斑减少量有显著差异。
在两周后,Jordan Power 电动牙刷与 Oral-B Advantage 或 Panbehriz Classic 手动牙刷在一组牙科学生中,在控制菌斑方面没有统计学上的显著差异。