Menzies D, Nair A, Hopkinson P, McFarlane L, Lipworth B J
Asthma and Allergy Research Group, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Allergy. 2007 Jun;62(6):661-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01376.x.
Extra-fine particle formulations of hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) exhibit clinical effects comparable with conventional particle formulations of chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate (CFC-BDP) at half the dose. There is little data comparing their effects on inflammation. We have evaluated the effects of HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP on pulmonary and systemic markers of asthmatic inflammation.
A double-blind randomized crossover trial was undertaken comparing the anti-inflammatory effects of HFA-BDP (100 and 400 microg/day) and CFC-BDP (200 and 800 microg/day). Treatment with montelukast was evaluated as add-on to the higher dose of BDP.
Compared with baseline after withdrawal of usual asthma therapy, 100 microg of HFA-BDP significantly attenuated serum eosinophilic cationic protein levels (0.61-fold change, 95% CI 0.49-0.77; a 39% reduction, P < 0.001), but 200 microg of CFC-BDP did not (0.87-fold change, 95% CI 0.63-1.23; P = 1). A dose of 800 microg of CFC-BDP and 400 microg of HFA-BDP led to reductions in exhaled nitric oxide (0.57-fold change, 95% CI 0.44-0.73; a 43% reduction, P < 0.001 and 0.65-fold change, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; a 35% reduction, P = 0.008, respectively); and peripheral eosinophils (-74 cells/microl, 95% CI -146 to -2; P = 0.020 and -77 cells/microl, 95% CI -140 to -14; P = 0.012, respectively). Montelukast further reduced exhaled nitric oxide (0.81-fold change, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; P = 0.028) with 400 microg HFA-BDP and eosinophils (-44 cells/microl, 95% CI -80 to -8; P = 0.012) with 800 microg CFC-BDP, but not vice versa.
Chlorofluorocarbon beclometasone dipropionate and HFA-BDP have differential effects on pulmonary and systemic inflammation, which dictate the additive effects of montelukast.
与传统的氯氟碳倍氯米松二丙酸酯(CFC-BDP)颗粒制剂相比,氢氟烷-134a倍氯米松二丙酸酯(HFA-BDP)的超细微颗粒制剂在剂量减半时表现出相当的临床效果。比较它们对炎症影响的数据很少。我们评估了HFA-BDP和CFC-BDP对哮喘炎症的肺部和全身标志物的影响。
进行了一项双盲随机交叉试验,比较HFA-BDP(100和400微克/天)和CFC-BDP(200和800微克/天)的抗炎作用。评估了孟鲁司特作为高剂量BDP附加治疗的效果。
与停用常规哮喘治疗后的基线相比,100微克的HFA-BDP显著降低了血清嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白水平(变化倍数为0.61,95%可信区间为0.49-0.77;降低了39%,P<0.001),但200微克的CFC-BDP没有(变化倍数为0.87,95%可信区间为0.63-1.23;P=1)。800微克的CFC-BDP和400微克的HFA-BDP导致呼出一氧化氮减少(变化倍数分别为0.57,95%可信区间为0.44-0.73;降低了43%,P<0.001和变化倍数为0.65,95%可信区间为0.47-0.91;降低了35%,P=0.008);以及外周血嗜酸性粒细胞减少(分别为-74个细胞/微升,95%可信区间为-146至-2;P=0.020和-77个细胞/微升,95%可信区间为-140至-14;P=0.012)。孟鲁司特与400微克HFA-BDP联合使用时进一步降低了呼出一氧化氮(变化倍数为0.81,95%可信区间为0.66-0.98;P=0.028),与800微克CFC-BDP联合使用时进一步降低了嗜酸性粒细胞(-44个细胞/微升,95%可信区间为-80至-8;P=0.012),但反之则不然。
氯氟碳倍氯米松二丙酸酯和HFA-BDP对肺部和全身炎症有不同的影响,这决定了孟鲁司特的附加作用。