Chen Xin, Kang Yingbo, Wang Liqing, Lin Lin, Zhu Zhe, Chen Rui
Department of Respiratory Diseases, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510280, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University Guangzhou 510282, China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):212-21. eCollection 2015.
The small-particle inhaled corticosteroid might be a new available way to treat uncontrolled asthma. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of extrafine hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) versus budesonide (BUD) in patients with asthma, a meta-analysis was performed. A systematic search was made of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Clinicaltrials.gov and Ovid, and a hand search of leading respiratory journals. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of asthma for 4 or more weeks with extrafine HFA-BDP, compared with BUD, were reviewed. Five studies involving 949 asthmatic patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in FEV1 (SMD=-0.03L, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.10L, I(2)=0%, P=0.70), morning PEF (WMD=0.88 L/min, 95% CI -5.96 to 7.72 L/min, I(2)=0%, P=0.80), evening PEF (WMD=6.32 L/min, 95% CI -1.17 to 13.81 L/min, I(2)=33%, P=0.10) and use of rescue medication (WMD=-0.13, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.06, I(2)=41%, P=0.18) between extrafine HFA-BDP at half of the daily dose and BUD group. Individual studies reported no significant differences in asthma exacerbations and 7-point Asthma Control Questionnaire score (ACQ-7). There were no significant difference in total number of adverse events (OR=1.04, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.38, I(2)=0%, P=0.81) between the two groups. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that extrafine HFA-BDP at half of daily dose is equivalent to BUD in improving lung function and use of rescue medication, without increasing adverse events in patients with asthma. Long-term trials are required to assess the efficacy and safety of extrafine HFA-BDP.
小颗粒吸入性糖皮质激素可能是治疗控制不佳哮喘的一种新的可行方法。为评估超细丙酸倍氯米松氢氟烷烃(HFA-BDP)与布地奈德(BUD)治疗哮喘患者的疗效和安全性,进行了一项荟萃分析。对PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、Clinicaltrials.gov和Ovid进行了系统检索,并对主要呼吸杂志进行了手工检索。对使用超细HFA-BDP治疗哮喘4周或更长时间与BUD进行比较的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了综述。五项涉及949例哮喘患者的研究符合纳入标准。在每日剂量一半的超细HFA-BDP组与BUD组之间,第1秒用力呼气容积(标准化均数差=-0.03L,95%可信区间-0.15至0.10L,I²=0%,P=0.70)、早晨呼气峰流速(加权均数差=0.88L/分钟,95%可信区间-5.96至7.72L/分钟,I²=0%,P=0.80)、晚上呼气峰流速(加权均数差=6.32L/分钟,95%可信区间-1.17至13.81L/分钟,I²=33%,P=0.10)及急救药物使用(加权均数差=-0.13,95%可信区间-0.31至0.06,I²=41%,P=0.18)方面无显著差异。个别研究报告哮喘急性加重和7分制哮喘控制问卷评分(ACQ-7)无显著差异。两组间不良事件总数无显著差异(比值比=1.04,95%可信区间0.78至1.38,I²=0%,P=0.81)。我们的荟萃分析表明,每日剂量一半的超细HFA-BDP在改善肺功能和急救药物使用方面与BUD相当,且不会增加哮喘患者的不良事件。需要进行长期试验来评估超细HFA-BDP的疗效和安全性。