Li Jiebing, Kisara Koki, Danielsson Sverker, Lindström Mikael E, Gellerstedt Göran
Division of Wood Chemistry and Pulp Technology, Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Carbohydr Res. 2007 Aug 13;342(11):1442-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2007.03.031. Epub 2007 Apr 21.
Uronic acids can be quantified either by a colorimetric determination after treatment with concentrated sulfuric acid and carbazole or by gas chromatography after methanolysis and subsequent acetylation. Both methods suffer from incomplete hydrolysis, an unavoidable degradation of the products to be analysed, and an inability to separate and quantify different types of uronic acids. In the present work, the fundamental chemistry involved in the two methods has been evaluated, and some modifications to increase their accuracy are suggested. By combining the two methods, a complete quantification of all individual types of uronic acids present in a sample can be achieved.
糖醛酸可以通过用浓硫酸和咔唑处理后的比色法测定,或者通过甲醇解和随后的乙酰化后的气相色谱法进行定量。这两种方法都存在水解不完全、待分析产物不可避免的降解以及无法分离和定量不同类型糖醛酸的问题。在本工作中,对这两种方法所涉及的基础化学进行了评估,并提出了一些提高其准确性的改进措施。通过结合这两种方法,可以实现对样品中所有单个类型糖醛酸的完整定量。