Kornelis Marcel, de Jonge Janneke, Frewer Lynn, Dagevos Hans
Social Science Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Risk Anal. 2007 Apr;27(2):327-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00885.x.
The aim of this study is to examine the preferences of consumers for different information sources when they have a question about food safety. On the basis of a nationally representative survey conducted in the Netherlands, five distinct consumer groups are identified that not only differ on the reported use of information sources but also regarding several personality characteristics and sociodemographic variables. The empirical results show that two-thirds of the consumers are selective in their use of information sources and prefer either institutional or social sources. So, multiple information-acquisition patterns exist among the general public. The study illustrates how these findings can help to develop effective risk communication strategies.
本研究的目的是考察消费者在对食品安全有疑问时对不同信息来源的偏好。基于在荷兰进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查,识别出了五个不同的消费者群体,他们不仅在信息来源的使用报告上存在差异,在一些个性特征和社会人口统计学变量方面也有所不同。实证结果表明,三分之二的消费者在信息来源的使用上具有选择性,他们更喜欢机构来源或社会来源。因此,普通大众中存在多种信息获取模式。该研究说明了这些发现如何有助于制定有效的风险沟通策略。